The gist of my problem is as follows:-
I'm writing a Mocha mock in Ruby for the method represented as "post_to_embassy" below. It is not really our concern, for the purpose of describing the problem, what the actual method does. But I need the mock to return a dynamic value. The proc '&prc' below is executing rightly in place of the actual method. But the "with" method in Mocha only allows for boolean values to be returned. So the code below outputs nil. I need it to output the value being passed through orderInfoXml. Does anyone know of an alternate method I can use?
require 'rubygems'
require 'mocha'
include Mocha::API
class EmbassyInterface 开发者_开发百科
def post_to_embassy(xml)
puts "This is from the original class:-"
puts xml
return xml
end
end
orderInfoXml = "I am THE XML"
mock = EmbassyInterface.new
prc = Proc.new do |orderXml|
puts "This is from the mocked proc:-"
puts orderXml
orderXml
end
mock.stubs(:post_to_embassy).with(&prc)
mock_result = mock.post_to_embassy(orderInfoXml)
p mock_result
#p prc.call("asd")
output:-
This is from the mocked proc:-
I am THE XML
nil
I'm not sure if there is a perfect method for this. But to make life easier, than to stubbing each possible response (as described in another answer), you could go with Mocha's yields
method.
require "rubygems"
require "mocha"
include Mocha::API
class EmbassyInterface
def post_to_embassy(xml)
puts "This is form the original class:-"
puts xml
xml
end
end
order_info_xml = "I am the xml"
mock = EmbassyInterface.new
prc = Proc.new do |order_xml|
puts "This is from the mocked proc:-"
puts order_xml
order_xml
end
mock.stubs(:post_to_embassy).yields prc
prc_return = nil
mock.post_to_embassy { |value| prc_return = value.call("hello world") }
puts prc_return
mock.post_to_embassy { |value| prc_return = value.call("foo") }
puts prc_return
outputs:
This is from the mocked proc:-
hello world
hello world
This is from the mocked proc:-
foo
foo
This will require you to assign the return of your prc, and it's not exactly pretty (imo). But, you don't have to stub out each expectation, which will give you quite a bit of freedom.
In general, you are normally better off specifying explicit return values in tests. It tends to make tests hard to understand and hard to maintain if you introduce separate logic into determining what value to return.
I would suggest that you either use Expectation#with with suitable ParameterMatchers to explicitly define return values for different parameter values or use the StateMachine functionality.
Mocha doesn't appear to support this. Add this to your test_helper.rb:
# Replace klass's method_name with method_implementation
def stub_replace(klass, method_name, &method_implementation)
klass.singleton_class.send(:alias_method, "#{method_name}_mock_backup", method_name)
klass.define_singleton_method(method_name, method_implementation)
end
def undo_stub_replace(klass, method_name)
klass.singleton_class.send(:alias_method, method_name, "#{method_name}_mock_backup")
end
Then replace the last 4 lines of your test with:
stub_replace(EmbassyInterface, :post_to_embassy, &prc)
mock_result = mock.post_to_embassy(orderInfoXml)
p mock_result
# cleanup
undo_stub_replace(EmbassyInterface, :post_to_embassy)
I haven't found a way to make the output of a mocked method completely dynamic, but if you have a limited, known number of inputs you can get the output to work correctly.
require 'rubygems'
require 'mocha'
include Mocha::API
class EmbassyInterface
def post_to_embassy(xml)
"original: #{xml}"
end
end
to_mock = EmbassyInterface.new
orderInfoXml1 = "I am the first XML."
orderInfoXml2 = "I am the second XML."
p to_mock.post_to_embassy(orderInfoXml1)
prc = Proc.new do |xml|
"mocked: #{xml}"
end
to_mock.stubs(:post_to_embassy).with(orderInfoXml1).returns(prc.call(orderInfoXml1))
to_mock.stubs(:post_to_embassy).with(orderInfoXml2).returns(prc.call(orderInfoXml2))
p to_mock.post_to_embassy(orderInfoXml1)
p to_mock.post_to_embassy(orderInfoXml2)
p to_mock.post_to_embassy(orderInfoXml1)
output:
"original: I am the first XML."
"mocked: I am the first XML."
"mocked: I am the second XML."
"mocked: I am the first XML."
精彩评论