I was reading subr.el and saw this code:
(defalias 'backward-delete-char 'delete-backward-char)
(defalias 'search-forward-regexp (symbol-function 're-search-forward))
Interestingly, the first line doesn't use symbol-function while the second line does. The only difference I know of these two ways of using defalias is that the help for backward-delet开发者_运维知识库e-char (the first one) displays that it is an alias for delete-backward-char while the help for search-forward-regexp doesn't.
Is there a case when the second way is better than the first way?
The two defalias
usages are slightly different. The first links the function cell for 'backward-delete-char
to that of 'delete-backward-char
. The second links the 'search-forward-regexp
to the function that is currently called by 're-search-forward
.
The difference is that if you later change the definition of 'delete-backward-char
, 'backward-delete-char
will now have the new behavior. Whereas in the second case, changing the function for 're-search-forward
has no effect on the behavior of 'search-forward-regexp
.
Perhaps some ascii art can help:
+-------------------------+ +-----------------+
|#<subr re-search-forward>| <-- |re-search-forward|
+-------------------------+ +-----------------+
^ +---------------------+
\------ |search-forward-regexp|
+---------------------+
+----------------------------+ +--------------------+ +--------------------+
|#<subr delete-backward-char>| <-- |delete-backward-char| <-- |backward-delete-char|
+----------------------------+ +--------------------+ +--------------------+
This documentation might help clear things up.
Well, it really is not the same thing... Here is a little game I just played:
(defun a () (message "hello"))
a
(a)
"hello"
(defalias 'b (symbol-function 'a))
(lambda nil (message "hello"))
(defalias 'c 'a)
a
(b)
"hello"
(c)
"hello"
(defun a () (message "howdy"))
a
(a)
"howdy"
(b)
"hello"
(c)
"howdy" ' c changed meaning, b did not...
精彩评论