开发者

How do I make this loop all children recursively?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-28 08:39 出处:网络
I have the following: for (var i = 0; i < children.length; i++){ if(hasClass(children[i], \"lbExclude\")){

I have the following:

for (var i = 0; i < children.length; i++){
   if(hasClass(children[i], "lbExclude")){
       children[i].parentNode.removeChild(children[i]);
   }
};

I would like it to loop through all children's children, etc (not just the top level). I found this line, which seems to do that:

for(var m = n.firstChild; m != null; m = m.nextSibling) {

But I'm unclear on how I refer to the current child if I make that switch? I would no longer have i to clarify the index position of the child. Any suggestions?

Thanks!

Update:

I'm now using the following, according to answer suggestions. Is this the corre开发者_如何转开发ct / most efficient way of doing so?

function removeTest(child) {
  if (hasClass(child, "lbExclude")) {
    child.parentNode.removeChild(child);
  }
}

function allDescendants(node) {
  for (var i = 0; i < node.childNodes.length; i++) {
    var child = node.childNodes[i];
    allDescendants(child);
    removeTest(child);
  }
}

var children = temp.childNodes;
for (var i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
  allDescendants(children[i]);
};


function allDescendants (node) {
    for (var i = 0; i < node.childNodes.length; i++) {
      var child = node.childNodes[i];
      allDescendants(child);
      doSomethingToNode(child);
    }
}

You loop over all the children, and for each element, you call the same function and have it loop over the children of that element.


Normally you'd have a function that could be called recursively on all nodes. It really depends on what you want to do to the children. If you simply want to gather all descendants, then element.getElementsByTagName may be a better option.

var all = node.getElementsByTagName('*');

for (var i = -1, l = all.length; ++i < l;) {
    removeTest(all[i]);
}


There's no need for calling the 'allDescendants' method on all children, because the method itself already does that. So remove the last codeblock and I think that is a proper solution (á, not thé =])

            function removeTest(child){     
                if(hasClass(child, "lbExclude")){
                    child.parentNode.removeChild(child);
                }
            }

            function allDescendants (node) {
                for (var i = 0; i < node.childNodes.length; i++) {
                  var child = node.childNodes[i];
                  allDescendants(child);
                  removeTest(child);
                }
            }           

            var children = allDescendants(temp);


You can use BFS to find all the elements.

function(element) {
    // [].slice.call() - HTMLCollection to Array
    var children = [].slice.call(element.children), found = 0;
    while (children.length > found) {
        children = children.concat([].slice.call(children[found].children));
        found++;
    }
    return children;
};

This function returns all the children's children of the element.


The most clear-cut way to do it in modern browsers or with babel is this. Say you have an HTML node $node whose children you want to recurse over.

Array.prototype.forEach.call($node.querySelectorAll("*"), function(node) {
  doSomethingWith(node);
});

The querySelectorAll('*') on any DOM node would give you all the child nodes of the element in a NodeList. NodeList is an array-like object, so you can use the Array.prototype.forEach.call to iterate over this list, processing each child one-by-one within the callback.


If you have jquery and you want to get all descendant elements you can use:

 var all_children= $(parent_element).find('*');

Just be aware that all_children is an HTML collection and not an array. They behave similarly when you're just looping, but collection doesn't have a lot of the useful Array.prototype methods you might otherwise enjoy.


if items are being created in a loop you should leave a index via id="" data-name or some thing. You can then index them directly which will be faster for most functions such as (!-F). Works pretty well for 1024 bits x 100 items depending on what your doing.

if ( document.getElementById( cid ) ) {
 return;
} else {
  what you actually want
}

this will be faster in most cases once the items have already been loaded. only scrub the page on reload or secure domain transfers / logins / cors any else and your doing some thing twice.


If you use a js library it's as simple as this:

$('.lbExclude').remove();

Otherwise if you want to acquire all elements under a node you can collect them all natively:

var nodes = node.getElementsByTagName('*');
for (var i = 0; i < nodes.length; i++) {
  var n = nodes[i];
  if (hasClass(n, 'lbExclude')) {
    node.parentNode.removeChild(node);
  }
}


To get all descendants as an array, use this:

function getAllDescendants(node) {
    var all = [];
    getDescendants(node);

    function getDescendants(node) {
        for (var i = 0; i < node.childNodes.length; i++) {
            var child = node.childNodes[i];
            getDescendants(child);
            all.push(child);
        }
    }
    return all;
}


TreeNode node = tv.SelectedNode;
while (node.Parent != null)
{
    node = node.Parent;
}                    
CallRecursive(node);


private void CallRecursive(TreeNode treeNode)
{            
    foreach (TreeNode tn in treeNode.Nodes)
    {
        //Write whatever code here this function recursively loops through all nodes                 
        CallRecursive(tn);
    }
}
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号