C++ Suppress Automatic Initialization and Destruction

How does one suppress the automatic initialization and destruction of a type? While it is wonderful that T buffer[100] automatically initializes all the elements of buffer, and destroys them when they fall out of scope, this is not the behavior I want.

#include <iostream>

static int created   = 0,
           destroyed = 0;

struct S
{
    S()
    {
        ++created;
    }
    ~S()
    {
        ++destroyed;
    }
};

template <typename T, size_t KCount>
class fixed_vector
{
private:
    T m_buffer[KCount];
public:
    fixed_vector()
    {
        // some way to suppress the automatic initialization of m_buffer
    }

    ~fixed_vector()
    {
        // some way to suppress the automatic destruction of m_bu开发者_如何学Cffer
    }
};

int main()
{
    {
        fixed_vector<S, 100> arr;
    }

    std::cout << "Created:\t"   << created   << std::endl;
    std::cout << "Destroyed:\t" << destroyed << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

The output of this program is:

Created:    100
Destroyed:  100

I would like it to be:

Created:    0
Destroyed:  0

My only idea is to make m_buffer some trivially constructed and destructed type like char and then rely on operator[] to wrap the pointer math for me, although this seems like a horribly hacked solution. Another solution would be to use malloc and free, but that gives a level of indirection that I do not want.

---

The reason why I want this is because I am making a container and I do not want to pay for the initialization overhead of things that I will not use. For example, if my main function was:

int main()
{
    {
        std::vector<S> vec;
        vec.reserve(50);
    }

    std::cout << "Created:\t"   << created   << std::endl;
    std::cout << "Destroyed:\t" << destroyed << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

The output would be correct:

Created:    0
Destroyed:  0

---

You may want to look into boost::optional

template <typename> struct tovoid { typedef void type; };

template <typename T, size_t KCount, typename = void>
struct ArrayStorage {
  typedef T type;
  static T &get(T &t) { return t; }
};

template <typename T, size_t KCount>
struct ArrayStorage<T, KCount, typename tovoid<int T::*>::type> {
  typedef boost::optional<T> type;
  static T &get(boost::optional<T> &t) {
    if(!t) t = boost::in_place();
    return *t;
  }
};

template <typename T, size_t KCount>
class Array
{
public:
    T &operator[](std::ptrdiff_t i) {
      return ArrayStorage<T, KCount>::get(m_buffer_[i]);
    }

    T const &operator[](std::ptrdiff_t i) const {
      return ArrayStorage<T, KCount>::get(m_buffer_[i]);
    }

    mutable typename ArrayStorage<T, KCount>::type m_buffer_[KCount];
};

A specialization is done for class type that wraps them into an optional, thus calling the constructor/destructor lazily. For non-class types, we don't need that wrapping. Not wrapping them means we can treat &a[0] as a contiguous memory area and pass that address to C functions that want an array. boost::in_place will create the class types in-place, without using a temporary T or its copy constructor.

Not using inheritance or private members allow the class to stay an aggregate, allowing a convenient form of initialization

// only two strings are constructed
Array<std::string, 10> array = { a, b };

---

You can create the array as array of chars and then use placement new to create the elements when needed.

template <typename T, size_t KCount>
class Array
{
private:
    char m_buffer[KCount*sizeof(T)]; // TODO make sure it's aligned correctly

    T operator[](int i) {
        return reinterpret_cast<T&>(m_buffer[i*sizeof(T)]);
    }

---

After re-reading your question it seems that you want a sparse array, this sometimes goes by the name of map ;o) (of course the performance characteristics are different...)

template <typename T, size_t KCount>
class SparseArray {
    std::map<size_t, T> m_map;
public:
    T& operator[](size_t i) {
        if (i > KCount)
            throw "out of bounds";
        return m_map[i];
    }

---

This code:

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;

int created = 0, destroyed = 0;

struct S
{
    S()
    {
        ++created;
    }
    S(const S & s ) {
        ++created;
    }
    ~S()
    {
        ++destroyed;
    }
};

int main()
{
    {
        std::vector<S> vec;
        vec.reserve(50);
    }

    std::cout << "Created:\t"   << created   << std::endl;
    std::cout << "Destroyed:\t" << destroyed << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

has exactly the output you want - I'm not sure what your question is.

---

If you want to be like vector, you should do something like this:

template <typename T>
class my_vector
{
    T* ptr; // this is your "array"
    // ...
    public:

    void reserve(size_t n)
    {
        // allocate memory without initializing, you could as well use malloc() here
        ptr = ::operator new (n*sizeof(T)); 
    }

    ~my_vector()
    {
        ::operator delete(ptr); // and this is how you free your memory
    }

    void set_element(size_t at, const T& element = T())
    {
        // initializes single element
        new (&ptr[at]) T(element); // placement new, copies the passed element at the specified position in the array
    }

    void destroy_element(size_t at)
    {
        ptr[at].~T(); // explicitly call destructor
    }
};

This code is obviously for demonstration only, I have omitted my_vector's copy-constructor and any tracking on what's created and what not (calling destructor on a location you haven't called constructor for is probably undefined behavior). Also, STL's vector allocations and deallocations are abstracted away through the use of allocators (the second template argument of vector).

Hope that helps

---

You can have a look at the way it's done with the STL containers, but I doubt you can spare yourself mallocs and frees