Can anyone give me a hand improving the performance of this cursor logic from SQL 2000. It runs great in SQl2005 and SQL2008, but takes at least 20 minutes to run in SQL 2000. BTW, I would never choose to use a cursor, and I didn't write this code, just trying to get it to run faster. Upgrading this client to 2005/2008 is not an option in the immediate future.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Rollup totals in the chart of accounts hierarchy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECLARE @B_SubTotalAccountID int, @B_Debits money, @B_Credits money, @B_YTDDebits money, @B_YTDCredits money
DECLARE Bal CURSOR FAST_FORWARD FOR
SELECT SubTotalAccountID, Debits, Credits, YTDDebits, YTDCredits FROM xxx
WHERE AccountType = 0 AND SubTotalAccountID Is Not Null and (abs(credits)+abs(debits)+abs(ytdcredits)+abs(ytddebits)<>0)
OPEN Bal
FETCH NEXT FROM Bal INTO @B_SubTotalAccountID, @B_Debits, @B_Credits, @B_YTDDebits, @B_YTDCredits
--For Each Active Account
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
--Loo开发者_JAVA技巧p Until end of subtotal chain is reached
WHILE @B_SubTotalAccountID Is Not Null
BEGIN
UPDATE xxx2
SET Debits = Debits + @B_Debits,
Credits = Credits + @B_Credits,
YTDDebits = YTDDebits + @B_YTDDebits,
YTDCredits = YTDCredits + @B_YTDCredits
WHERE GLAccountID = @B_SubTotalAccountID
SET @B_SubTotalAccountID = (SELECT SubTotalAccountID FROM xxx2 WHERE GLAccountID = @B_SubTotalAccountID)
END
FETCH NEXT FROM Bal INTO @B_SubTotalAccountID, @B_Debits, @B_Credits, @B_YTDDebits, @B_YTDCredits
END
CLOSE Bal
DEALLOCATE Bal
Update xx2
Set Credits = Credits + X1.CreditTotal
, Debits = Debits + X1.DebitTotal
, YtdDebits = YtdDebits + X1.YtdDebitTotal
, YtdCredits = YtdCredits + X1.YtdDebitTotal
From xx2 As X2
Join (
Select SubTotalAccountID, Sum(Debits) As DebitTotal, Sum(Credits) As CreditTotal
, Sum(YtdDebits) As YtdDebitTotal, Sum(YtdCredits) As YtdCreditTotal
From xxx
Where AccountType = 0
And SubTotalAccountID Is Not Null
And (
Credits <> 0
Or Debits <> 0
Or YtdCredits <> 0
Or YtdDebits <> 0
)
Group By SubTotalAccountID
) As X1
On X1.SubTotalAccountID = X2.GLAccountID
Without schema, I could not tell if the xxx
table would return multiple rows for a given SubTotalAccountId. I assumed that it could and grouped the values by this column so that I get one row per SubTotalAccountId.
I also replaced your use of ABS in the WHERE clause with simply checks against zero. This should be substantially faster.
This UPDATE statement should be a complete replacement for your cursor.
A couple of suggestions:
1 - use the profiler to tell you which part of it runs slowly - you can get a duration for each statement
2 - run the initial select statement (the cursor declaration) outside of the procedure and check the query plan. Does it run quickly? Is it using indexes properly?
3 - same thing with the update statement - check the query plan and index usage
4 - the 'set' statement after the update looks odd - it seems to be getting a value into @B_SubTotalAccountID which is then replaced immediately by the 'fetch next'
精彩评论