what would be the shortest way to write this?
if(strpos($haystack, $needle)!==false){
$len = strpos($haystack, $needle)+strlen($needle);
}else{
$len = 开发者_StackOverflow0;
}
I remember that I saw some shortcut somewhere for this that checked and set a variable at the same time.
$len = 0;
if(($pos = strpos($haystack, $needle)) !== false) {
$len = $pos + strlen($needle);
}
I'd recommend against the ternary ?:
operator, even if it is shorter.
$len = strpos($haystack, $needle);
$len = ($len !== false) ? $len + strlen($needle) : 0;
$len=strpos($haystack, $needle);
if($len !== FALSE) {
$len += strlen($needle);
}
and, in my opinion, ternary operator is terrible impact on readability.
It is called the tenary operator and can be used like this:
$len = strpos($haystack, $needle) ? strpos($haystack, $needle)+strlen($needle) : 0;
You should use it with care though, because it can make some expressions quite hard to read.
$len = strpos($haystack, $needle) ? strpos($haystack, $needle)+strlen($needle) : 0;
See also Ternary Operation.
A different approach:
$len = strlen(preg_replace('/(.*?'.preg_quote($needle,'/').')?.*/', '$1', $haystack));
Probably slower and more memory-intensive, but it does require less typing. So whether or not it's actually a shortcut depends on the definition. It does present a valid option if you're allergic to ternary operators and assignment within evaluation conditions.
You could also do
$len = preg_match('/'.preg_quote($needle,'/').'()/', $haystack, $m, PREG_OFFSET_CAPTURE)? $m[1][1] : 0
although again it's a bit wasteful of resources to be using preg_ functions to search for fixed strings.
精彩评论