I have 2 canvases, one uses HTML attributes width
and height
to size it, the other uses CSS:
<canvas id="compteur1" width="300" height="300" onmousedown="compteurClick(this.id);"></canvas>
<canvas id="compteur2" style="width: 300px; height: 300px;" onmousedown="compteurClick(this.id);"></canvas>
Compteur1 displays like it should, but not compteur2. The content is d开发者_JAVA百科rawn using JavaScript on a 300x300 canvas.
Why is there a display difference?
It seems that the width
and height
attributes determine the width or height of the canvas’s coordinate system, whereas the CSS properties just determine the size of the box in which it will be shown.
This is explained in the HTML specification:
The
canvas
element has two attributes to control the size of the element’s bitmap:width
andheight
. These attributes, when specified, must have values that are valid non-negative integers. The rules for parsing non-negative integers must be used to obtain their numeric values. If an attribute is missing, or if parsing its value returns an error, then the default value must be used instead. Thewidth
attribute defaults to 300, and theheight
attribute defaults to 150.
To set the width
and height
on a canvas, you may use:
canvasObject.setAttribute('width', '150');
canvasObject.setAttribute('height', '300');
For <canvas>
elements, the CSS rules for width
and height
set the actual size of the canvas element that will be drawn to the page. On the other hand, the HTML attributes of width
and height
set the size of the coordinate system or 'grid' that the canvas API will use.
For example, consider this (jsfiddle):
var ctx = document.getElementById('canvas1').getContext('2d');
ctx.fillStyle = "red";
ctx.fillRect(10, 10, 30, 30);
var ctx2 = document.getElementById('canvas2').getContext('2d');
ctx2.fillStyle = "red";
ctx2.fillRect(10, 10, 30, 30);
canvas {
border: 1px solid black;
}
<canvas id="canvas1" style="width: 50px; height: 100px;" height="50" width="100"></canvas>
<canvas id="canvas2" style="width: 100px; height: 100px;" height="50" width="100"></canvas>
Both have had the same thing drawn on them relative to the internal coordinates of the canvas element. But in the second canvas, the red rectangle will be twice as wide because the canvas as a whole is being stretched across a bigger area by the CSS rules.
Note: If the CSS rules for width
and/or height
aren't specified then the browser will use the HTML attributes to size the element such that 1 unit of these values equals 1px on the page. If these attributes aren't specified then they will default to a width
of 300
and a height
of 150
.
The canvas will be stretched if you set the width and height in your CSS. If you want to dynamically manipulate the dimension of the canvas you have to use JavaScript like so:
canvas = document.getElementById('canv');
canvas.setAttribute('width', '438');
canvas.setAttribute('height', '462');
The browser uses the css width and height, but the canvas element scales based on the canvas width and height. In javascript, read the css width and height and set the canvas width and height to that.
var myCanvas = $('#TheMainCanvas');
myCanvas[0].width = myCanvas.width();
myCanvas[0].height = myCanvas.height();
Shannimal correction
var el = $('#mycanvas');
el.attr('width', parseInt(el.css('width')))
el.attr('height', parseInt(el.css('height')))
canvas renders image by buffer, so when you specify the width and height html attributes the buffer size and length changes, but when you use css, the buffer's size is unchanged. making the image stretched.
Using html sizing.
size of canvas is changed -> buffer size is changed -> rendered
Using css sizing
size of canvas is changed -> rendered
since the buffer length is kept unchanged, when the context renders the image, the image is displayed in resized canvas (but rendered in unchanged buffer).
CSS sets the width and height of the canvas element so it affects the coordinate space leaving everything drawn skewed
Here's my way on how to set the width and height with Vanilla JavaScript
canvas.width = numberForWidth
canvas.height = numberForHeight
I believe CSS has much better machinery for specifying the size of the canvas and CSS must decide styling, not JavaScript or HTML. Having said that, setting width and height in HTML is important for working around the issue with canvas.
CSS has !important
rule that allows to override other styling rules for the property, including those in HTML. Usually, its usage is frowned upon but here the use is a legitimate hack.
In Rust module for WebAssembly you can do the following:
fn update_buffer(canvas: &HtmlCanvasElement) {
canvas.set_width(canvas.client_width() as u32);
canvas.set_height(canvas.client_height() as u32);
}
//..
#[wasm_bindgen(start)]
pub fn start() -> Result<(), JsValue> {
// ...
let canvas: Rc<_> = document
.query_selector("canvas")
.unwrap()
.unwrap()
.dyn_into::<HtmlCanvasElement>()
.unwrap()
.into();
update_buffer(&canvas);
// ...
// create resizing handler for window
{
let on_resize = Closure::<dyn FnMut(_)>::new(move |_event: Event| {
let canvas = canvas.clone();
// ...
update_buffer(&canvas);
// ...
window.add_event_listener_with_callback("resize", on_resize.as_ref().unchecked_ref())?;
on_resize.forget();
}
}
There we update the canvas buffer once the WASM module is loaded and then whenever the window is resized. We do it by manually specifying width
and height
of canvas as values of clientWidth
and clientHeight
. Maybe there are better ways to update the buffer but I believe this solution is better than those suggested by @SamB, @CoderNaveed, @Anthony Gedeon, @Bluerain, @Ben Jackson, @Manolo, @XaviGuardia, @Russel Harkins, and @fermar because
- The element is styled by CSS, not HTML.
- Unlike
elem.style.width
&elem.style.height
trick used by @Manolo or its JQuery equivalent used by @XaviGuardia, it will work forcanvas
whose size is specified by usage asflex
orgrid
item. - Unlike the solution by @Russel Harkings, this also handles resizing. Though I like his answer because it is really clean and easy.
- WASM is the future! Haha :D
P.S. there's a ton of .unwrap()
because Rust explicitly handles possible failures.
P.P.S.
{
let on_resize = Closure::<dyn FnMut(_)>::new(move |_event: Event| {
let canvas = canvas.clone();
// ...
update_buffer(&canvas);
// ...
window.add_event_listener_with_callback("resize", on_resize.as_ref().unchecked_ref())?;
on_resize.forget();
}
can be done much cleaner with better libraries. E.g.
add_resize_handler(&window, move |e: ResizeEvent| {
let canvas = canvas.clone();
// ...
update_buffer(&canvas);
})
If you want a dynamic behaviour based on, e.g. CSS media queries, don't use canvas width and height attributes. Use CSS rules and then, before getting the canvas rendering context, assign to width and height attributes the CSS width and height styles:
var elem = document.getElementById("mycanvas");
elem.width = elem.style.width;
elem.height = elem.style.height;
var ctx1 = elem.getContext("2d");
...
精彩评论