Context Free Language Question (Pumping Lemma)

I know this isn't directly related to programming, but I was wondering if anyone know how to apply the pumping lemma to the following proof:

Show that L={(a^n)(b^n)(c^m) : n!=m} is not a context free language

I'm pretty confident with a开发者_如何学Cpplying pumping lemmas, but this one is really irking me. What do you think?

---

Edit: I was totally leading you down the wrong track. That's what happens when I try to help out when I haven't completely solved the problem myself.

Ogden's Lemma

Suppose L is context free. By Ogden's lemma, there exists an integer p that has the following properties:

Given a string w in L at least p symbols long, where at least p of those symbols are "marked", w can be represented as uvxyz, which satisfy:

1. x has at least one marked symbol,
2. either u and v both have marked symbols or y and z both have marked symbols,
3. vxy has at most p marked symbols, and
4. u vⁱ x yⁱ z is in L for i >= 0

That's Ogden's lemma. Now, let q be an integer divisible by every positive integer no greater than p. Let w = a^p+q b^p+q c^p. Mark every c. By #2, u or v must contain at least one c. If either u or v contains any other symbol, then #4 fails, so u and v must contain only c. But then #4 fails when i = q/|uv|. We know q is divisible by |uv| because p > |uv| > 0, and q is divisible by all positive integers less than p.

Note that Ogden's lemma turns into the pumping lemma when you mark all symbols.

Pumping Lemma

Suppose L is context free. By the pumping lemma, there is a length p (not necessarily the same p as above) such that any string w in L can be represented as uvxyz, where

1. |vxy| <= p,
2. |vy| >= 1, and
3. u vⁱ x yⁱ z is in L for i >= 0.

Given a string w in L, either m > n or m < n. Suppose p = 2.

Suppose that m > n. (Note that Λ denotes the empty string.)

• Let u = aⁿ bⁿ c^m-1
• Let v = c
• Let x = Λ
• Let y = Λ
• Let z = Λ

Suppose that n > m.

• Let u = a^n-1
• Let v = a
• Let x = Λ
• Let y = b
• Let z = b^n-1 c^m

This demonstrates that no string from L provides a counterexample using the pumping lemma to the supposition that L is a context free language (even though it is context sensitive).