开发者

Binary Search Tree in Java

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-25 09:12 出处:网络
I want to make a generic BST, that can be made up of any data type, but i\'m not sure how I could add things to the tree, if my BST is generic. All of my needed code is below. I want my BST made up of

I want to make a generic BST, that can be made up of any data type, but i'm not sure how I could add things to the tree, if my BST is generic. All of my needed code is below. I want my BST made up of Locations, and sorted by the x variable. Any help is appreciated.

Major thanks for looking.

public void add(E element)
{
    if (root == null)
         root = element;
    if (element < root)
         add(element, root.leftChild);
    if (element > root)
         add(element, root.rightChild);
    else
         System.out.println("Element Already Exists");
}

private void add(E element, E currLoc)
{
    if (currLoc == null)
         currLoc = element;
    if (element < root)
         add(element, currLoc.leftChild);
    if (element > root)
         add(element, currLoc.rightChild);
    else
         System.out.println("Element Already Exists);
}

Other Code

public class BinaryNode<E>
{
    E BinaryNode;
    BinaryNode nextBinaryNode;
    BinaryNode prevBinaryNode;

    public BinaryNode()
    {
        BinaryNode = null;
        nextBinaryNode = null;
        prevBinaryNode = null;
    }

}


public class Location<AnyType> extends BinaryNode
{
    String name;
    int x,y;

    public Location()
    {
        name = null;
        x = 0;
        y = 0;
    }

    public Location(String newName, int xCord, int yCord)
    {
        name = newName;
        x = xCord;
        y = yCord;
    }

    public int equals(Location othe开发者_运维问答rScene)
    {
        return name.compareToIgnoreCase(otherScene.name);
    }


}


You can constrain your type to implement Comparable<? super E>:

public class BinarySearchTree<E extends Comparable<? super E>>

Then you can call compareTo:

// Instead of if (element < root)
if (element.compareTo(root) < 0)

(etc)

Alternatively, you could force the caller to pass in a Comparator<E> when the search tree is constructed, and then use that to compare elements. That's actually a more flexible solution in my view - it means you could create different binary search trees for the same element type, but ordering them in different ways.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消