0x004012d0 <main+0>: push %ebp
0x004012d1 <main+1>: mov %esp,%ebp
0x004012d3 <main+3>: sub $0x28,%esp
If the address is not available, can we ca开发者_如何学JAVAlculate it ourselves?
I mean we only have this:
push %ebp
mov %esp,%ebp
sub $0x28,%esp
amount of bytes is difference of addresses between adjacent instructions:
0x004012d0 <main+0>: push %ebp ;1 byte
0x004012d1 <main+1>: mov %esp,%ebp ;2 bytes
0x004012d3 <main+3>: sub $0x28,%esp
if you have only text then go here: http://www.swansontec.com/sintel.html and here: http://faydoc.tripod.com/cpu/conventions.htm and calculate for each instruction, prefix and operand
You can't necessarily determine the instruction size from the mnemonic. Here are some special cases:
if you're in a 16-bit segment,
mov eax, 0
requires a0x66
prefix, while in a 32-bit segment it doesn't. You need to know the size of the segment.in 32-bit or 16-bit mode you can encode
add eax, 1
as either0x40
(inc eax
) or0x83 0xc0 0x01
(add eax, 1
). That is, there are some mnemonics that can be encoded in more than one way.The memory operand
[eax]
may encodeeax
as either the base or the index. If it's the index, you'll have an additional SIB byte after the MOD/RM.in 64-bit mode you can use the REX prefix
0x4x
to encode the registersr8
-r15
. However, you can use0x40
as some sort of null REX byte, which will add another byte to your instruction.segment overrides may be used, even if the explicit segment is the same as the implicit one.
There are many other ways to encode an instruction using more or less bytes. A good assembler should probably always use the shortest one, but it's certainly not required by the architecture. The good thing is that if you study volume 2 of the Intel IA-32 Software Developer's Manual, you should be able to work it out by yourself.
The first instruction is at [main+0] and the second is at [main+1] so the first instruction is 1 byte. The third instruction is at [main+3], so the second instruction is two bytes. You can't tell from the listing how long the third instruction is, since it doesn't show the address of the 4. instruction.
In case you have the assembly code in text, you'll have to use an assembler routine to get the
binary representation, and thus the size of the instruction(s). Of course, that is hardware dependent.
For example, here is an 80x86 32-bit Assembler open source code (OllyDbg v1.10).
If possible have the assembler generate a listing. This will show your source code and next to will be the binary representation of the instructions and all you need to do is count how many bytes there are and then you got the size.
精彩评论