We extensively use a third party app that we'll call thirdparty.com. thirdparty.com and mysite.com have a common navigation and look and feel, so to the u开发者_如何学运维sers, they think they are always on mysite.com.
What we're going to do is start url rewriting 3rd.mysite.com to display thirdparty.com, to make it look even more like a seamless experience. This also gives us access to thirdparty.com's cookie, because it will be written as mysite.com.
thirdparty.com has an SSL cert that they use for a few select transactions (basically just login). When you call https://3rd.mysite.com/login, you get a 404 as mysite.com does not have SSL. So we're going to install an SSL cert to the 3rd.mysite.com subdomain to alleviate this problem.
The question is, if we install a EV SSL certificate, will the user see that, or will it relegate to the cert from thirdparty.com? I can think of reasons for this to work both ways, but am looking for a definitive answer. If they see the SSL cert, then there's no sense wasting money on the EVSSL. If they see the EVSSL, I'd think that would be a big opening for phishing if someone was doing this illegitimately.
Cheers
If user agents see the site as thirdparty.com
they are going to require an https certificate for thirdparty.com
. So if that's an EV cert, then they are indeed going to see the green glow. Of course, you will want to make sure any communications between thirdparty.com
and mysite.com
should be appropriately secure.
(BTW: rfc2606 for example domain names.)
Disclaimer: I'm not really competent to answer this question, but this is stackoverflow.
精彩评论