Number of different elements in an array

Is it possible to compute the number of different elements in an array in linear time and constant space? Let us say it's an array o开发者_Python百科f long integers, and you can not allocate an array of length sizeof(long).

P.S. Not homework, just curious. I've got a book that sort of implies that it is possible.

---

This is the Element uniqueness problem, for which the lower bound is Ω( n log n ), for comparison-based models. The obvious hashing or bucket sorting solution all requires linear space too, so I'm not sure this is possible.

---

You can't use constant space. You can use O(number of different elements) space; that's what a HashSet does.

---

You can use any sorting algorithm and count the number of different adjacent elements in the array.

---

I do not think this can be done in linear time. One algorithm to solve in O(n log n) requires first sorting the array (then the comparisons become trivial).

---

If you are guaranteed that the numbers in the array are bounded above and below, by say a and b, then you could allocate an array of size b - a, and use it to keep track of which numbers have been seen.

i.e., you would move through your input array take each number, and mark a true in your target array at that spot. You would increment a counter of distinct numbers only when you encounter a number whose position in your storage array is false.

---

Assuming we can partially destroy the input, here's an algorithm for n words of O(log n) bits.

Find the element of order sqrt(n) via linear-time selection. Partition the array using this element as a pivot (O(n)). Using brute force, count the number of different elements in the partition of length sqrt(n). (This is O(sqrt(n)^2) = O(n).) Now use an in-place radix sort on the rest, where each "digit" is log(sqrt(n)) = log(n)/2 bits and we use the first partition to store the digit counts.

---

If you consider streaming algorithms only ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streaming_algorithm ), then it's impossible to get an exact answer with o(n) bits of storage via a communication complexity lower bound ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_complexity ), but possible to approximate the answer using randomness and little space (Alon, Matias, and Szegedy).

---

This can be done with a bucket approach when assuming that there are only a constant number of different values. Make a flag for each value (still constant space). Traverse the list and flag the occured values. If you happen to flag an already flagged value, you've found a duplicate. You have to traverse the buckets for each element in the list. But that's still linear time.