<ListView>
<ListView.Res开发者_如何学Pythonources>
<DataTempalte x:Key="label">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Label}"/>
</DataTEmplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="editor">
<UserControl Content="{Binding Control.content}"/> <!-- This is the line -->
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.Resources>
<ListView.View>
<GridView>
<GridViewColumn Header="Name" CellTemplate="{StaticResource label}"/>
<GridViewColumn Header="Value" CellTemplate="{StaticResource editor}"/>
</GridView>
</ListView.View>
On the marketed line, I'm replacing the contents of a UserControl with the contents of another UserControl that is dynamically created in code. I'd like to replace the entire control, and not just the content. Is there a way to do this?
Edit:
To clarify my intent, the Items
that my ListView
collection holds owns a Control (which inherits from UserControl
) that knows how to manipulate the item's value. Simply binding the Content gets me the visual representation, but discards other non-content related properties of the derived Control. If I could replace that UserControl in my template in a more whole-sale fashion, this would fix that problem.
I finally figured this one out:
<DataTemplate x:Key="editor">
<ContentPresenter Content="{Binding Path=Control}"/>
</DataTemplate>
The ContentPresenter is exactly what I was looking for.
Looks like you want to switch between label and textbox in a cell based on some state. I'd use trigger for that.
Or see if this might be of use: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/editabletextblock.aspx
Updated:
Here's a hack (I don't recommend this and I hate myself a little for posting it):
<DataTemplate x:Key="editor">
<Border Loaded="Border_Loaded">
<UserControl Content="{Binding Control.content}"/>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
In code behind:
private void Border_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
// Example of replacement
Button b = new Button();
b.Content = "Woot!";
((Border)sender).Child = b;
}
Obviously, you'll need to store the reference to the border and keep track of which border belongs to which cell. I can't imagine this is less complex than switching templates.
精彩评论