I'm finding some problems with a query that re开发者_如何学Goturns the sum of a field from a table for all the records that meet certain conditions. I expected to receive a "No records found' when there were no records, but instead I'm receiving a null result.
SQL> SELECT * FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2;
no rows selected
SQL> SELECT SUM(dummy) FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2;
SUM(DUMMY)
----------
SQL>
Is there any way to not receive any record in that case?
"I expected to receive a "No records found' when there were no records, but instead I'm receiving a null result."
Then do
SELECT SUM(dummy) FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2 HAVING COUNT(*) > 0
That is, specify that you only want to return a summary where there were rows that were considered.
SELECT SUM(dummy) FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2 HAVING SUM(dummy) IS NOT NULL
is similar, but the COUNT(*) would return a summary row if there were only rows for which dummy was null, while the latter would not.
How about this:
select my_sum
from
(SELECT SUM(dummy) as my_sum FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2)
where
my_sum is not null
You can filter out the null
results with having
SELECT SUM(dummy) FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2 HAVING SUM(dummy) IS NOT NULL
No - this is the behavior by design of the RDBMS in use here, Which, to me atleast, makes sense, as you are looking for a sum and not raw data
The sum of zero numbers is equal to 0 (that's math). So it would be only natural for select sum(something) to return 0 if there are no records to sum, similarly to select count(*) that should return 0 if the count is 0 (no records satisfying the predicate). That's in an ideal world of course.
use the coalesce function of mysql and do:
SELECT COALESCE(SUM(where),0) FROM table WHERE condition = variable
SELECT SUM(dummy) FROM DUAL GROUP BY 1
You can group by the another metric. For example month and then sql also returns 0 rows:
SELECT SUM(dummy), DATE_FORMAT(day, '%Y-%m') as month
FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2
GROUP BY month
精彩评论