开发者

why gcc 4.x default reserve 8 bytes for stack on linux when calling a method?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-22 00:50 出处:网络
as a beginner of asm, I am checking gcc -S generated asm code to learn. why gcc 4.x default reserve 8 bytes for stack when calling a method?

as a beginner of asm, I am checking gcc -S generated asm code to learn.

why gcc 4.x default reserve 8 bytes for stack when calling a method?

func18 is the empty function with no return no param no local var defined. I can't figure out why 8 bytes is reserved here (neither any forum/site mention for the reason, ppl seems take it for granted) is it for the %ebp just push? or return type?! many thx!

      .globl _func18
  _func18:
     pushl   %ebp 
     movl    %esp, %eb开发者_开发问答p 
     subl    $8, %esp 
     .text 


Some instructions require certain data types to be aligned to as much as a 16-byte boundary (in particular, the SSE data type __m128). To meet this requirement, gcc ensures that the stack is initially 16-byte aligned, and allocates stack space in multiples of 16 bytes. If only a 4-byte return address and 4-byte frame pointer need to be pushed, 8 additional bytes are needed to keep the stack aligned to a 16-byte boundary. However, if gcc determines that the additional alignment is unnecessary (i.e. the fancy data types are not used and no external functions are called), then it may omit any additional instructions used to align the stack. The analysis necessary to determine this may require certain optimization passes to be performed.

See also the gcc documentation for the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary=num.


As richard mentioned above, it's all because of optimization, showing below. but still I got no idea why 8 bytes reserved is something optimized?!

original c

void func18() {}
int main() {return 0;}

compile without optimization flag specified

    .text                                                                                   
.globl _func18
_func18:
    pushl   %ebp
    movl    %esp, %ebp
    subl    $8, %esp
    leave
    ret
.globl _main
_main:                                                                                      
    pushl   %ebp
    movl    %esp, %ebp
    subl    $8, %esp
    movl    $0, %eax
    leave
    ret
    .subsections_via_symbols

with -Os optimization flag, no more stack reserve

    .text
.globl _func18
_func18:
    pushl   %ebp
    movl    %esp, %ebp
    leave
    ret
.globl _main
_main:
    pushl   %ebp
    xorl    %eax, %eax
    movl    %esp, %ebp
    leave
    ret
    .subsections_via_symbols


Easy way to find out: Have you empty function call another function with one parameter. If the parameter is stored directly to the stack (no push), then that's what the extra space is for.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消