I ran a build last night, successfully. I got up this morning and ran another without changing any configuration or modifying any source code. Now my build is failing with the message "No source for code" when running my nosetests with coverage.
NoSource: No source for code: '/home/matthew/.hudson/jobs/myproject/workspace/tests/unit/util.py'
. . .
No source for code: '/home/matthew/.hudson/jobs/myproject/workspace/__init__.py'
The only clue I have is that the files it says it can't find aren't there, but they never were and they're not supposed to be. For example, in the latter, Hudson's workspace isn't a Python module, so __init__.py
wouldn't be there.
Update: I've confirmed that this isn't a Hudson issue. When I run nostests with coverage in the directory itself, I see similar messages. Again, the files that coverage is looking for were n开发者_StackOverflowever there to begin with, making this very puzzling.
I'm not sure why it thinks that file exists, but you can tell coverage.py to ignore these problems with a coverage xml -i
switch.
If you want to track down the error, drop me a line (ned at ned batchelder com).
Ensure theres no .pyc file there, that may have existed in the past.
Summary: Existing .coverage data is kept around when running nosetests --with-coverage
, so remove it first.
Details: I too just encountered this via Hudson and nosetests. This error was coming from coverage/results.py:18
(coverage 3.3.1 - there were 3 places raising this error, but this was the relevant one). It's trying to open the .py file corresponding to the module that was actually traced. A small demo:
$ echo print > hello.py
$ echo import hello > main.py
$ coverage run main.py
$ rm hello.py
$ coverage xml
No source for code: '/tmp/aoeu/hello.py'
Apparently I had a file stopwords.pyc that was executed/traced, but no stopwords.py. Yet nowhere in my code was I importing stopwords, and even removing the .pyc I still got the error.
A simple strings .coverage
then revealed that the reference to stopwords.py still existed. nosetests --with-coverage
is using coverage's append or merge functionality, meaning the old .coverage data still lingers around. Indeed, removing .coverage addressed the issue.
Just use the '--cover-erase' argument. It fixes this error and you don't have to manually delete coverage files
nosetests --with-coverage --cover-erase
I'd strongly recommend checking out the help to see what other args you're missing too and don't forget those plugins either
The problem is that the .pyc
file still exists.
A quick and dirty solution is to delete all .pyc
files in that directory:
find . -name "*.pyc" -exec rm -rf {} \;
coverage report -m
can be called just so, without providing any argument (see official quick instructions).
But it works on 1st script coverage-ed, not on 2nd. E.g.
coverage run -m f1.py
coverage report -m # works
coverage run -m f2.py
coverage report -m # fails (f2.py instead of f1.py in last coverage run)
Instead, always indicate script as argument of coverage report -m
:
file="f2.py" && coverage run $file && coverage report -m $file
Coverage reporting docs
Maybe this will help, but I ran into a similar error today. And it's a permission error. My code is using a checkout from another user (by design, down ask) and I need to sudo in order for coverage to work. So your issue may have something to it.
I ran into this problem as well when trying to run nosetests coverage through setuptools. As mentioned, it is possible to delete existing .pyc files but that can be cumbersome.
I ended up having to create a .coveragerc file with the following
[report]
ignore_errors = True
to fix this error.
I had this problem. pytest-cov
claimed there is no code for existing files full of valid and covered code. I removed those warnings just by removing .coverage
file. It is of course recreated on next runs.
A bit another case, but anyway...
Don't be foolish as me, use just coverage html
, not coverage report html
精彩评论