开发者

Sybase: trying to lock a record on select so another caller does not get the same one

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-21 02:04 出处:网络
I have a simple table in Sybase, let\'s say it looks as follows: CREATE TABLE T ( name VARCHAR(10), entry_date datetime,

I have a simple table in Sybase, let's say it looks as follows:

CREATE TABLE T
(
   name VARCHAR(10),
   entry_date datetime,
   in_use CHAR(1)
)

I want to get the next entry based on order of "entry_date" and immediately update "in_use" to "Y" to indicate that the record is not available to the next query that comes in. The kicker is that if two execution paths try to run the query at the same time I want the second one to block so it does not grab the same record.

The problem is I've found that you cannot do "SELECT FOR UPDATE" in Sybase if you have an ORDER BY clause, so the following stored proc cannot be created because of the following error due to the ORDER BY clause in the select - "'FOR UPDATE' incorrectly specified when using a READ ONLY cursor'.

Is there a better way to get the next record, lock it, and update it all in one atomic step?


CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.sp_getnextrecord
@out1 varchar(10) out,
@out2 datetime out
AS
DECLARE @outOne varchar(10)开发者_运维知识库, @outTwo datetime

BEGIN TRANSACTION 

-- Here is the problem area Sybase does not like the
-- combination of 'ORDER BY' and 'FOR UPDATE' 
DECLARE myCursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT TOP 1 name, entry_date FROM T
WHERE in_use = 'N'
ORDER BY entry_Date asc FOR UPDATE OF in_use

OPEN myCursor

FETCH NEXT FROM myCursor
INTO @outOne, @outOne

-- Check @@FETCH_STATUS to see if there are any more rows to fetch.
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN

   UPDATE t SET IN_USE = 'Y' WHERE 
     name = @outOne AND entry_date = @outTwo

   SELECT @out1 = @outOne
   SELECT @out2 = @outTwo

   -- This is executed as long as the previous fetch succeeds.
   FETCH NEXT FROM myCursor
        INTO @outOne, @outTwo
END

CLOSE myCursor
DEALLOCATE myCursor

COMMIT TRANSACTION


since you are selecting just one row (TOP 1) why not just use a standard locking hint and forget the cursor:

BEGIN TRANSACTION

SELECT @PK=ID FROM YourTable WITH (UPDLOCK, HOLDLOCK, READPAST) WHERE ...

UPDATE ....
WHERE pk=@PK

COMMIT

if you really do need to loop, google "CURSOR FREE LOOP"

What are the different ways to replace a cursor?

you can loop by SELECTing the next MIN(PK)>@CurrentPk while using the locking hints on the SELECT.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消