How to fix the Hibernate "object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing" error_问答_开发者

I receive following error when I save the object using Hibernate

o开发者_高级运维bject references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing

You should include cascade="all" (if using xml) or cascade=CascadeType.ALL (if using annotations) on your collection mapping.

This happens because you have a collection in your entity, and that collection has one or more items which are not present in the database. By specifying the above options you tell hibernate to save them to the database when saving their parent.

I believe this might be just repeat answer, but just to clarify, I got this on a @OneToOne mapping as well as a @OneToMany. In both cases, it was the fact that the Child object I was adding to the Parent wasn't saved in the database yet. So when I added the Child to the Parent, then saved the Parent, Hibernate would toss the "object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing" message when saving the Parent.

Adding in the cascade = {CascadeType.ALL} on the Parent's reference to the Child solved the problem in both cases. This saved the Child and the Parent.

Sorry for any repeat answers, just wanted to further clarify for folks.

@OneToOne(cascade = {CascadeType.ALL})
@JoinColumn(name = "performancelog_id")
public PerformanceLog getPerformanceLog() {
    return performanceLog;
}

Introduction

When using JPA and Hibernate, an entity can be in one of the following 4 states:

New - A newly created object that hasn’t ever been associated with a Hibernate Session (a.k.a Persistence Context) and is not mapped to any database table row is considered to be in the New or Transient state.

To become persisted we need to either explicitly call the persist method or make use of the transitive persistence mechanism.

Persistent - A persistent entity has been associated with a database table row and it’s being managed by the currently running Persistence Context.

Any change made to such an entity is going to be detected and propagated to the database (during the Session flush-time).

Detached - Once the currently running Persistence Context is closed all the previously managed entities become detached. Successive changes will no longer be tracked and no automatic database synchronization is going to happen.
Removed - Although JPA demands that managed entities only are allowed to be removed, Hibernate can also delete detached entities (but only through a remove method call).

Entity state transitions

To move an entity from one state to the other, you can use the persist, remove or merge methods.

How to fix the Hibernate "object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing" error

Fixing the problem

The issue you are describing in your question:

object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing

is caused by associating an entity in the state of New to an entity that's in the state of Managed.

This can happen when you are associating a child entity to a one-to-many collection in the parent entity, and the collection does not cascade the entity state transitions.

So, you can fix this by adding cascade to the entity association that triggered this failure, as follows:

The `@OneToOne` association

@OneToOne(
    mappedBy = "post",
    orphanRemoval = true,
    cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
private PostDetails details;

Notice the CascadeType.ALL value we added for the cascade attribute.

The `@OneToMany` association

@OneToMany(
    mappedBy = "post", 
    orphanRemoval = true,
    cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
private List<Comment> comments = new ArrayList<>();

Again, the CascadeType.ALL is suitable for the bidirectional @OneToMany associations.

Now, in order for the cascade to work properly in a bidirectional, you also need to make sure that the parent and child associations are in sync.

The `@ManyToMany` association

@ManyToMany(
    mappedBy = "authors",
    cascade = {
        CascadeType.PERSIST, 
        CascadeType.MERGE
    }
)
private List<Book> books = new ArrayList<>();

In a @ManyToMany association, you cannot use CascadeType.ALL or orphanRemoval as this will propagate the delete entity state transition from one parent to another parent entity.

Therefore, for @ManyToMany associations, you usually cascade the CascadeType.PERSIST or CascadeType.MERGE operations. Alternatively, you can expand that to DETACH or REFRESH.

This happens when saving an object when Hibernate thinks it needs to save an object that is associated with the one you are saving.

I had this problem and did not want to save changes to the referenced object so I wanted the cascade type to be NONE.

The trick is to ensure that the ID and VERSION in the referenced object is set so that Hibernate does not think that the referenced object is a new object that needs saving. This worked for me.

Look through all of the relationships in the class you are saving to work out the associated objects (and the associated objects of the associated objects) and ensure that the ID and VERSION is set in all objects of the object tree.

Or, if you want to use minimal "powers" (e.g. if you don't want a cascade delete) to achieve what you want, use

import org.hibernate.annotations.Cascade;
import org.hibernate.annotations.CascadeType;

...

@Cascade({CascadeType.SAVE_UPDATE})
private Set<Child> children;

In my case it was caused by not having CascadeType on the @ManyToOne side of the bidirectional relationship. To be more precise, I had CascadeType.ALL on @OneToMany side and did not have it on @ManyToOne. Adding CascadeType.ALL to @ManyToOne resolved the issue. One-to-many side:

@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy="globalConfig", orphanRemoval = true)
private Set<GlobalConfigScope>gcScopeSet;

Many-to-one side (caused the problem)

@ManyToOne
@JoinColumn(name="global_config_id")
private GlobalConfig globalConfig;

Many-to-one (fixed by adding CascadeType.PERSIST)

@ManyToOne(cascade = CascadeType.PERSIST)
@JoinColumn(name="global_config_id")
private GlobalConfig globalConfig;

This occurred for me when persisting an entity in which the existing record in the database had a NULL value for the field annotated with @Version (for optimistic locking). Updating the NULL value to 0 in the database corrected this.

This isn't the only reason for the error. I encountered it just now for a typo error in my coding, which I believe, set a value of an entity which was already saved.

X x2 = new X();
x.setXid(memberid); // Error happened here - x was a previous global entity I created earlier
Y.setX(x2);

I spotted the error by finding exactly which variable caused the error (in this case String xid). I used a catch around the whole block of code that saved the entity and printed the traces.

{
   code block that performed the operation
} catch (Exception e) {
   e.printStackTrace(); // put a break-point here and inspect the 'e'
   return ERROR;
}

Don't use Cascade.All until you really have to. Role and Permission have bidirectional manyToMany relation. Then the following code would work fine

    Permission p = new Permission();
    p.setName("help");
    Permission p2 = new Permission();
    p2.setName("self_info");
    p = (Permission)crudRepository.save(p); // returned p has id filled in.
    p2 = (Permission)crudRepository.save(p2); // so does p2.
    Role role = new Role();
    role.setAvailable(true);
    role.setDescription("a test role");
    role.setRole("admin");
    List<Permission> pList = new ArrayList<Permission>();
    pList.add(p);
    pList.add(p2);
    role.setPermissions(pList);
    crudRepository.save(role);

while if the object is just a "new" one, then it would throw the same error.

If your collection is nullable just try: object.SetYouColection(null);

beside all other good answers, this could happen if you use merge to persist an object and accidentally forget to use merged reference of the object in the parent class. consider the following example

merge(A);
B.setA(A);
persist(B);

In this case, you merge A but forget to use merged object of A. to solve the problem you must rewrite the code like this.

A=merge(A);//difference is here
B.setA(A);
persist(B);

This issue happened to me when I created a new entity and an associated entity in a method marked as @Transactional, then performed a query before saving. Ex

@Transactional
public someService() {
    Entity someEntity = new Entity();
    AssocaiatedEntity associatedEntity = new AssocaitedEntity();
    someEntity.setAssociatedEntity(associatedEntity);
    associatedEntity.setEntity(someEntity);

    // Performing any query was causing hibernate to attempt to persist the new entity. It would then throw an exception
    someDao.getSomething();

    entityDao.create(someEntity);
}

To fix, I performed the query before creating the new entity.

To add my 2 cents, I got this same issue when I m accidentally sending null as the ID. Below code depicts my scenario (and OP didn't mention any specific scenario).

Employee emp = new Employee();
emp.setDept(new Dept(deptId)); // --> when deptId PKID is null, same error will be thrown
// calls to other setters...
em.persist(emp);

Here I m setting the existing department id to a new employee instance without actually getting the department entity first, as I don't want to another select query to fire.

In some scenarios, deptId PKID is coming as null from calling method and I m getting the same error.

So, watch for null values for PK ID

It can also happen when you are having OneToMany relation and you try to add the child entity to the list in parent entity, then retrieve this list through parent entity (before saving this parent entity), without saving child entity itself, e.g.:

Child childEntity = new Child();
parentEntity.addChild(childEntity);
parentEntity.getChildren(); // I needed the retrieval for logging, but one may need it for other reasons.
parentRepository.save(parentEntity);

The error was thrown when I saved the parent entity. If I removed the retrieval in the previous row, then the error was not thrown, but of course that's not the solution.

The solution was saving the childEntity and adding that saved child entity to the parent entity, like this:

Child childEntity = new Child();
Child savedChildEntity = childRepository.save(childEntity);
parentEntity.addChild(savedChildEntity);
parentEntity.getChildren();
parentRepository.save(parentEntity);

If you're using Spring Data JPA then addition @Transactional annotation to your service implementation would solve the issue.

I also faced the same situation. By setting following annotation above the property made it solve the exception prompted.

The Exception I faced.

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: org.hibernate.TransientObjectException: object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing: com.model.Car_OneToMany

To overcome, the annotation I used.

    @OneToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.ALL})
    @Column(name = "ListOfCarsDrivenByDriver")
    private List<Car_OneToMany> listOfCarsBeingDriven = new ArrayList<Car_OneToMany>();

What made Hibernate throw the exception:

This exception is thrown at your console because the child object I attach to the parent object is not present in the database at that moment.

By providing @OneToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.ALL}) , it tells Hibernate to save them to the database while saving the parent object.

i get this error when i use

getSession().save(object)

but it works with no problem when I use

getSession().saveOrUpdate(object)

For the sake of completeness: A

org.hibernate.TransientPropertyValueException

with message

object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing

will also occur when you try to persist / merge an entity with a reference to another entity which happens to be detached.

One other possible reason: in my case, I was attempting to save the child before saving the parent, on a brand new entity.

The code was something like this in a User.java model:

this.lastName = lastName;
this.isAdmin = isAdmin;
this.accountStatus = "Active";
this.setNewPassword(password);
this.timeJoin = new Date();
create();

The setNewPassword() method creates a PasswordHistory record and adds it to the history collection in User. Since the create() statement hadn't been executed yet for the parent, it was trying to save to a collection of an entity that hadn't yet been created. All I had to do to fix it was to move the setNewPassword() call after the call to create().

this.lastName = lastName;
this.isAdmin = isAdmin;
this.accountStatus = "Active";
this.timeJoin = new Date();
create();
this.setNewPassword(password);

There is another possibility that can cause this error in hibernate. You may set an unsaved reference of your object A to an attached entity B and want to persist object C. Even in this case, you will get the aforementioned error.

There are so many possibilities of this error some other possibilities are also on add page or edit page. In my case I was trying to save a object AdvanceSalary. The problem is that in edit the AdvanceSalary employee.employee_id is null Because on edit I was not set the employee.employee_id. I have make a hidden field and set it. my code working absolutely fine.

    @Entity(name = "ic_advance_salary")
    @Table(name = "ic_advance_salary")
    public class AdvanceSalary extends BaseDO{

        @Id
        @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
        @Column(name = "id")
        private Integer id;

        @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
        @JoinColumn(name = "employee_id", nullable = false)
        private Employee employee;

        @Column(name = "employee_id", insertable=false, updatable=false)
        @NotNull(message="Please enter employee Id")
        private Long employee_id;

        @Column(name = "advance_date")
        @DateTimeFormat(pattern = "dd-MMM-yyyy")
        @NotNull(message="Please enter advance date")
        private Date advance_date;

        @Column(name = "amount")
        @NotNull(message="Please enter Paid Amount")
        private Double amount;

        @Column(name = "cheque_date")
        @DateTimeFormat(pattern = "dd-MMM-yyyy")
        private Date cheque_date;

        @Column(name = "cheque_no")
        private String cheque_no;

        @Column(name = "remarks")
        private String remarks;

        public AdvanceSalary() {
        }

        public AdvanceSalary(Integer advance_salary_id) {
            this.id = advance_salary_id;
        }

        public Integer getId() {
            return id;
        }

        public void setId(Integer id) {
            this.id = id;
        }

        public Employee getEmployee() {
            return employee;
        }

        public void setEmployee(Employee employee) {
            this.employee = employee;
        }


        public Long getEmployee_id() {
            return employee_id;
        }

        public void setEmployee_id(Long employee_id) {
            this.employee_id = employee_id;
        }

    }

I think is because you have try to persist an object that have a reference to another object that is not persist yet, and so it try in the "DB side" to put a reference to a row that not exists

Case 1: I was getting this exception when I was trying to create a parent and saving that parent reference to its child and then some other DELETE/UPDATE query(JPQL). So I just flush() the newly created entity after creating parent and after creating child using same parent reference. It Worked for me.

Case 2:

Parent class

public class Reference implements Serializable {

    @Id
    @Column(precision=20, scale=0)
    private BigInteger id;

    @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
    private Date modifiedOn;

    @OneToOne(mappedBy="reference")
    private ReferenceAdditionalDetails refAddDetails;
    . 
    .
    .
}

Child Class:

public class ReferenceAdditionalDetails implements Serializable{

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

    @Id
    @OneToOne
    @JoinColumn(name="reference",referencedColumnName="id")
    private Reference reference;

    private String preferedSector1;
    private String preferedSector2;
    .
    .

}

In the above case where parent(Reference) and child(ReferenceAdditionalDetails) having OneToOne relationship and when you try to create Reference entity and then its child(ReferenceAdditionalDetails), it will give you the same exception. So to avoid the exception you have to set null for child class and then create the parent.(Sample Code)

.
.
reference.setRefAddDetails(null);
reference = referenceDao.create(reference);
entityManager.flush();
.
.

In my case , issue was completely different. I have two classes let's say c1 & c2. Between C1 & C2 dependency is OneToMany. Now if i am saving C1 in DB it was throwing above error.

Resolution of this problem was to get first C2's id from consumer request and find C2 via repository call.Afterwards save c2 into C1 object .Now if i am saving C1, it's working fine.

I was facing the same error for all PUT HTTP transactions, after introducing optimistic locking (@Version)

At the time of updating an entity it is mandatory to send id and version of that entity. If any of the entity fields are related to other entities then for that field also we should provide id and version values, without that the JPA try to persist that related entity first as a new entity

Example: we have two entities --> Vehicle(id,Car,version) ; Car(id, version, brand); to update/persist Vehicle entity make sure the Car field in vehicle entity has id and version fields provided

Simple way of solving this issue is save the both entity. first save the child entity and then save the parent entity. Because parent entity is depend on child entity for the foreign key value.

Below simple exam of one to one relationship

insert into Department (name, numOfemp, Depno) values (?, ?, ?)
Hibernate: insert into Employee (SSN, dep_Depno, firstName, lastName, middleName, empno) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)

Session session=sf.openSession();
        session.beginTransaction();
        session.save(dep);
        session.save(emp);

One possible cause of the error is the inexistence of the setting of the value of the parent entity ; for example for a department-employees relationship you have to write this in order to fix the error :

Department dept = (Department)session.load(Department.class, dept_code); // dept_code is from the jsp form which you get in the controller with @RequestParam String department
employee.setDepartment(dept);

I faced this exception when I did not persist parent object but I was saving the child. To resolve the issue, with in the same session I persisted both the child and parent objects and used CascadeType.ALL on the parent.

My problem was related to @BeforeEach of JUnit. And even if I saved the related entities (in my case @ManyToOne), I got the same error.

The problem is somehow related to the sequence that I have in my parent. If I assign the value to that attribute, the problem is solved.

Ex. If I have the entity Question that can have some categories (one or more) and entity Question has a sequence:

@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "feedbackSeq")
@Id
private Long id;

I have to assign the value question.setId(1L);

Just make Constructor of your mapping in your base class. Like if you want One-To-One relation in Entity A, Entity B. if your are taking A as base class, then A must have a Constructor have B as a argument.