We have 2 object types and want to connect them N:N. For example, articles & authors.
- How would you name relations table?
- What would you put first at table name, articles or authors? (articles2authors or b开发者_开发知识库ooks2authors)
Someone would, probably, recognize this question as stupid. I don't think so because I'm looking for ideal naming convention.
Thank you.
Choose any
- Junction Table
- Cross-Reference Table
- Bridge Table
- Join Table
- Map Table
- Link Table
, but please do not use '2' to replace 'to', which is so 1970.
I personally prefer Junction
: AuthorsArticlesJunction
, AuthorsBooksJunction
. I put Authors
first because without an author neither article, nor book would not exist. This is somewhat metaphysical, but works for me.
I prefer map - so something like AUTHOR_ARTICLE_MAP, when used consistently, explains how the table is used.
I'd use AuthorArticle
. Generally the 'primary' object should go first (if one can be determined), but the ordering is not a big deal.
1) article_has_author (just my "privat" convention)m or ArticleAuthor 2) in n:m relations it normaly doesnt matter.
Depends on the logical relations , for example:
- Article_Author
- Links , UserRoles -> LinksForUserRoles / Links_For_UserRoles
- User , Role - > UserRole
精彩评论