开发者

Event handler raising method convention

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-20 06:17 出处:网络
I was just browsing and came across this question: Action vs delegate event The answer from nobug included this code:

I was just browsing and came across this question:

Action vs delegate event

The answer from nobug included this code:

protected virtual void OnLeave(EmployeeEventArgs e) {
  var handler = Leave;
  if (handler != null)
    handler(this, e);
}

Resharper also generates similar code when using the "create raising method" quick-fix.

My question is, why is this line necessary?:

var handler = Leave;

Why is it b开发者_C百科etter than writing this?:

protected virtual void OnLeave(EmployeeEventArgs e) {
  if (Leave != null)
    Leave(this, e);
}


It's better because there is a tiny possibility that Leave becomes null after the null check, but before the invocation (which would cause your code to throw a NullReferenceException). Since the delegate type is immutable, if you first assign it to a variable this possibility goes away; your local copy will not be affected by any changes to Leave after the assignment.

Note though that this approach also creates a issue in reverse; it means that there is a (tiny, but existing) possibility that an event handler gets invoked after it has been detached from the event. This scenario should of course be handled gracefully as well.


In a multi-threaded application, you could get a null reference exception if the caller unregisters from the event. The assignment to a local variable protects against this.

Odds are you'd never see this (until it hurts you the worst). Here's a way of looking at it that shows the problem...

protected virtual void OnLeave(EmployeeEventArgs e) {
  if (Leave != null) //subscriber is registered to the event
  {
    //Subscriber unregisters from event....
    Leave(this, e); //NullReferenceException!
  }
}


Here's an excellent explanation by Eric Lippert :

Events and races

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消