We are considering purchasing Perforce and OnTime for SCM and Bug Tracking respectively when discovered that with Visual Studio 2010 we'll get both Source Control & Bug Tracking integrated into it and for free (if you are a MSDN subscriber).
More in general, does it still worth to invest in these standalone and expensive tools? What are the benefits compared to what Visual S开发者_如何学JAVAtudio 2010 Team System has to offer?
I found this document but still refers to VS2008: http://www.perforce.com/perforce/comparisons/perforce_mstfs.pdf
Thanks,
Alberto
To get the Team Foundation Server (TFS) Client Access Licence (CAL) each use will need at least MSDN-Professional (if I recall correctly). Other users will still need a separate CAL.
TFS does include both version control and work item tracking (and bugs are one kind of work item).
There are a number of reasons to prefer PerForce (or any other alternate ALM suite), includingL
- It does something you need that TFS doesn't. (Note "need", you might like it, but will you really use that feature having paid for it).
- You need to work with tools or people that use PerForce.
The starting point for TFS documentation is:
- Product Overview and more marketing/sales/overview information: http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-gb/products/2010/default.mspx#overview
- MSDN Documentation (details of usage, administration, customisation, ...): http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/fda2bad5(VS.100).aspx
With the VS2010 Release Candidate about to be freely available (tomorrow) why not give it a try. For some scale (evaluation use) it will run on a fairly low powered VM.
精彩评论