I've gotta be missing something simple here.
Take the following code:
public IEnumerable<int> getInt(){
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++){
yield return i;
}
}
I can call this with:
foreach (int j in obj.getInt()){
//do something with j
开发者_运维技巧}
How can I use the getInt method without the foreach loop:
IEnumerable<int> iter = obj.getInt();
// do something with iter ??
Thanks.
EDITS
For those wondering why I'd want this. I'm iterating two things:
IEnumerator<int> iter = obj.getInt().GetEnumerator();
foreach(object x in xs){
if (x.someCondition) continue;
iter.MoveNext();
int n = iter.current();
x.someProp = n;
etc...
}
You can get a reference to the Enumerator
, using the GetEnumerator
method, then you can use the MoveNext()
method to move on, and use the Current
property to access your elements:
var enumerator = getInt().GetEnumerator();
while(enumerator.MoveNext())
{
int n = enumerator.Current;
Console.WriteLine(n);
}
My advice: don't mess around with the enumerators at all. Characterize your problem as a series of operations on sequences. Write code to express those operations. Let the sequence operators take care of managing the enumerators.
So let's see if I've got this straight. You have two sequences. Let's say { 2, 3, 5, 7, 12 } and { "frog", "toad" }. The logical operation you want to perform is, say "go through the first sequence. Every time you find a number divisible by three, get the next item in the second sequence. Do something with the resulting (number, amphibian) pair."
Easily done. First, filter the first sequence:
var filtered = firstSequence.Where(x=>x%3 == 0);
Next, zip the filtered sequence with the second sequence:
var zipped = filtered.Zip(
secondSequence,
(y, z)=> new {Number = x, Amphibian = y});
And now you can iterate over the zipped sequence and do whatever you want with the pairs:
foreach(var pair in zipped)
Console.WriteLine("{0} : {1}", pair.Number, pair.Amphibian);
Easy peasy, no messing about with enumerators.
How about this?
IEnumerator<int> iter = obj.getInt();
using(iter) {
while(iter.MoveNext()) {
DoSomethingWith(iter.Current)
}
}
using for loop:
for (var enumerator = getInt().GetEnumerator(); enumerator.MoveNext(); )
{
Console.WriteLine(enumerator.Current);
}
It's important to mention that the duty of the foreach
loop is to dispose the enumerator if the instance implements IDisposable
. In other words, foreach
should be replaced with something like:
var enumerator = enumerable.GetEnumerator();
try
{
while (enumerator.MoveNext())
{
var item = enumerator.Current;
// do stuff
}
}
finally
{
var disposable = enumerator as IDisposable;
if (disposable != null)
{
disposable.Dispose();
}
}
Although the accepted answers are correct, notice that IEnumerator.Current is undefined before the first call to MoveNext().
If you are iterating over a secondary array, you'll want something like:
IEnumerable<Foo> Foo() { ... }
int AssignValues(List<TakesFoo> data) {
var count = 0;
var foo = Foo().GetEnumerator();
// Step into the first element of the array;
// doing this does not discard a value from the IEnumerator
if (foo.MoveNext()) {
foreach (var x in data) {
x.SetFoo(foo.Current);
count += 1;
if (!foo.MoveNext()) {
break;
}
}
// Return count of assigned values
return count;
}
Sample,
public static void SampleIteratorNext()
{
var beauty = BeautifulLadies().GetEnumerator();
Console.WriteLine($"Friday with {Next(beauty)} ...");
Console.WriteLine($"Saturday with {Next(beauty)} ...");
Console.WriteLine($"Tusday with {Next(beauty)} ...");
}
public static IEnumerable<string> BeautifulLadies()
{
yield return "Scarlett";
yield return "Alexandra";
yield return "Alisson";
}
// emulate next() in python
public static T Next<T>(IEnumerator<T> iterator)
{
iterator.MoveNext();
return iterator.Current;
}
精彩评论