This is driving me crazy. Please someone tell me I'm not crazy:
var constraints = $('.traffic-constraints :开发者_开发知识库input');
console.log(constraints);
var i;
for (i = 0; i < constraints.length; i++) {
if (constraints[i].val() > 0) { //<-------- errorrzz
....
the console tells me that i do, in fact, have input objects in my selector (5 of them). however, i get the following error: constraints[i].val is not a function
wtf?
First, use .each()
it's easier :)
But, to answer the question why doesn't it work...you're dealing with a dom element with that index, you need to wrap it or .eq(i)
acesss it:
for (i = 0; i < constraints.length; i++) {
if ($(constraints[i]).val() > 0) {
Or (better, but still use .each()
!):
for (i = 0; i < constraints.length; i++) {
if (constraints.eq(i).val() > 0) {
Accessing elements like that (e.g. $('.traffic-constraints :input')[0]
) returns the HTML element (or DOM node, to be more pedantic). If you want to get the element jQuery-wrapped, call constraints.eq (i)
jQuery has an .each()
method to loop through the elements of a collection. You can use it as such:
$('.traffic-constraints :input').each(function(index) {
if($(this).val() > 0) {
doSomething();
}
});
The reason why your loop isn't working is that the elements are not extended with jQuery's methods. The following fixes it:
var constraints = $('.traffic-constraints :input');
console.log(constraints);
var i;
for (i = 0; i < constraints.length; i++) {
if ($(constraints[i]).val() > 0) {
doSomething();
}
}
But for reasons of code maintainability and best practices, use .each()
. It isn't noticeably slower and is easier to maintain and understand.
Why don't you use each?
精彩评论