I would like to introduce some assembly code into a c99 codebase. I want to use the UMULL instruction from the ARM CPU to multiply 2 uint32_t and get the result immediately into a uint64_t.
Now a uint64_t needs 2 registers, so how do I specify the output and the constraints of the asm开发者_Go百科 block?
Good question!
The following code outputs what you want using GCC -O
or higher without resorting to assembler:
uint32_t a, b; uint64_t c; ... c = (uint64_t)a * (uint64_t)b;or if you feel you must use machine-specific asm, you can go:
uint32_t a, b; uint64_t c;asm ("umull %Q0, %R0, %1, %2" : "=r"(c) : "r"(a), "r"(b));
c
's register name is the first of the register pair, and %Q and %R pick out the lower and upper 32-bit registers of the pair. See gcc/config/arm/arm.md -> umulsidi3 for an example.
However, if you can stay in C, that gives the optimizer a chance to do more and is kinder on readers of your program.
The umull
instruction produces its results into two 32-bit registers. I suggest explicitly reassembling the 64-bit value with something like that:
/* assuming the 64-bit result was stored in "hi" (upper
half) and "lo" (lower half) */
uint64_t v = ((uint64_t)hi << 32) | (uint64_t)lo;
The compiler optimizer should notice that the left-shift is pure data routing, and the resulting code should be fine. To be sure, just use -S
to check the compiler output.
精彩评论