开发者

how can I get the ARM MULL instruction to produce its output in a uint64_t in gcc?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-19 15:06 出处:网络
I would like to introduce some assembly code into a c99 codebase. I want to use the UMULL instruction from the ARM CPU to multiply 2 uint32_t and get the result immediately into a uint64_t.

I would like to introduce some assembly code into a c99 codebase. I want to use the UMULL instruction from the ARM CPU to multiply 2 uint32_t and get the result immediately into a uint64_t.

Now a uint64_t needs 2 registers, so how do I specify the output and the constraints of the asm开发者_Go百科 block?


Good question!

The following code outputs what you want using GCC -O or higher without resorting to assembler:

uint32_t a, b;
uint64_t c;
...
c = (uint64_t)a * (uint64_t)b;
or if you feel you must use machine-specific asm, you can go:
uint32_t a, b;
uint64_t c;

asm ("umull %Q0, %R0, %1, %2" : "=r"(c) : "r"(a), "r"(b));

c's register name is the first of the register pair, and %Q and %R pick out the lower and upper 32-bit registers of the pair. See gcc/config/arm/arm.md -> umulsidi3 for an example.

However, if you can stay in C, that gives the optimizer a chance to do more and is kinder on readers of your program.


The umull instruction produces its results into two 32-bit registers. I suggest explicitly reassembling the 64-bit value with something like that:

/* assuming the 64-bit result was stored in "hi" (upper
   half) and "lo" (lower half) */
uint64_t v = ((uint64_t)hi << 32) | (uint64_t)lo;

The compiler optimizer should notice that the left-shift is pure data routing, and the resulting code should be fine. To be sure, just use -S to check the compiler output.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号