开发者

Transforming an object implicitly

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-18 17:45 出处:网络
The following code illustrates a pattern I sometimes see, whereby an object is transformed implicitly as it is passed as a parameter across a number of method calls.

The following code illustrates a pattern I sometimes see, whereby an object is transformed implicitly as it is passed as a parameter across a number of method calls.

var o = new MyReferenceType();
DoSomeWorkAndPossiblyModifyO(o);
DoYetMoreWorkAndPossiblyFurtherModifyO(o);

//now use o...
开发者_如何转开发

This feels wrong to me (it hardly feels object oriented). Is it acceptable?


Based on your method names, I would argue that there is nothing implicit in the transformation. This pattern would be acceptable. If, on the other hand your methods had names like printO(o) or compareTo(o), but actually modified the Object o, the design would be bad.


It is acceptable but usually bad style. The usual "good" approach is:

DoSomeWorkAndModify(&o);  // explicit reference means we will be accepting changes

o = DoSomeWorkAndReturnModified(o); // much more elastic because you often want to keep original.

The approach you presented makes sense when o is huge, and making a copy of it in memory is out of question, or if it's a function you (and nobody else = private) use very frequently and don't want to bother with the & syntax. Otherwise it's laziness that results in some really difficult to detect bugs.


It depends entirely on what the methods actually do, besides modifying that object.

For instance, an object primarily related to keeping some state in memory might for instance not have anything related to persisting that state anywhere.

The methods could for instance load data from a database, and update the object with that information.

However! Since I program mostly in C# and thus .NET, which is a wholly object-oriented language, I would actually write your code like this:

var o = new MyReferenceType();
SomeOtherClass.DoSomeWorkAndPossiblyModifyO(o);
SomeOtherClass.DoYetMoreWorkAndPossiblyFurtherModifyO(o);

//now use o...

In which case the actual name of that other class (or those other classes if there's 2 involved) would give me a big clue as to what is actually happening and/or the context.

Example:

Person p = new Person();
DatabaseContext.FetchAllLazilyLoadedProperties(p);
DatabaseContext.Save(p); // updates primary key property with new ID
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消