开发者

Using a Qt-based DLL in a non-Qt application

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-18 02:53 出处:网络
Am I doing it right? A client of mine has a group where I\'m developing Qt-based client-server stuff with a lot of fun widget stuff and sockets.

Am I doing it right?

A client of mine has a group where I'm developing Qt-based client-server stuff with a lot of fun widget stuff and sockets.

Another group within the company wants to use a wrapped version of the QTcpSocket-based client data provider classes. (Which does basically what it sounds like, provides data from the server to the client displays)

However, that group has a huge application built mostly with MFC, and that is simply not going to change any time soon. The Qt-based DLL is also delay-loading so that it can be deployed without this feature in certain configurations.

I've got it working, but it's a little hacky. Here's my solution at the moment:

The DLL wrapper class constructor calls QCoreApplication::instance() to see if it's NULL or not. If it's NULL, it assumes it's in a non-Qt app, and creates a QCoreApplication instance of it's own:

if (QCoreApplication::instance开发者_如何学运维() == NULL)
{
    int argc = 1;
    char* argv[] = { "dummy.exe", NULL };
    d->_app = new QCoreApplication(argc, argv);  // safe?
}
else
    d->_app = NULL;

It then will set up a windows timer to occasionally call processEvents():

if (eventTimerInterval > 0)
{
    // STATE: start a timer to occasionally process the Qt events in the event queue
    SetTimer(NULL, (UINT_PTR)this, eventTimerInterval, CDatabaseLayer_TimerCallback);
}

The callback simply calls the processEvents() function using the timerID as a pointer to the class instance. The SetTimer() docs say when HWND is NULL it ignores the timerID, so this appears to be perfectly valid.

VOID CALLBACK BLAHBLAH_TimerCallback(HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, UINT_PTR idEvent, DWORD dwTime)
{
    ((BLAHBLAH*)idEvent)->processEvents(); // basically just calls d->_app->processEvents();
}

I then destroy the QCoreApplication instance as the very last thing in the destructor.

BLAHBLAH::~BLAHBLAH()
{
    .. other stuff

   QCoreApplication* app = d->_app;
   d->_app = NULL;
   delete d;
   if (app != NULL)
       delete app;
}

If the hosting application wishes to time the calls to processEvents() itself, it can pass 0 in for eventTimerInterval and call BLAHBLAH::processEvents() itself.

Any thoughts on this? Porting that app to Qt is not an option. It's not ours.

It appears to work, but there are probably several assumptions being broken here. Can I just construct a QCoreApplication with dummy arguments like that? Is the event queue safe to operate in this manner?

I don't want this blowing up in my face later. Thoughts?


Studying the Qt code it seems QCoreApplication is needed to dispatch system-wide messages such as timer events. Things like signal/slots and even QThreads do not depend on it unless they are related to those system-wide messages. Here is how I do this in a shared library (in a cross platform way using Qt itself) and I actually do call exec, because processEvents() alone does not process everything.

I have a global namespace:

// Private Qt application
namespace QAppPriv
{
    static int argc = 1;
    static char * argv[] = {"sharedlib.app", NULL};
    static QCoreApplication * pApp = NULL;
    static QThread * pThread = NULL;
};

I have an OpenApp method in a QObject (that is moc'ed) like this:

// Initialize the app
if (QAppPriv::pThread == NULL)
{
    // Separate thread for application thread
    QAppPriv::pThread = new QThread();
    // Direct connection is mandatory
    connect(QAppPriv::pThread, SIGNAL(started()), this, SLOT(OnExec()), Qt::DirectConnection);
    QAppPriv::pThread->start();
}

And here is OnExec slot:

if (QCoreApplication::instance() == NULL)
{
    QAppPriv::pApp = new QCoreApplication(QAppPriv::argc, QAppPriv::argv);
    QAppPriv::pApp->exec();
    if (QAppPriv::pApp)
        delete QAppPriv::pApp;
}

So far it seems to be working fine, I am not sure if I need to delete the app at the end, I will update my answer if I find something.


The Qt Documentation for 4.5.2 says that the arguments to QCoreApplication need to have lifetimes as long as the application object - so you shouldn't really use local variables.

Apart from that little thing:

I'm grappling with the same problem, and everything seems to work for me too. I would recommend being very careful at unload / exit time, however, since if you're using the event loop from another application and that event loop is stopped before your library is unloaded then all sorts of crashy nastiness can happen when you try to close() sockets and delete QObjects.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消