Inheriting from a container with non-virtual destructor

I'm trying to use forward declarations and d-pointers to eliminate some include dependencies. Everything is working well, except that I have used XLi开发者_如何学编程st typedefs for readability in many places (e.g: typedef QList<X> XList).

The workaround for the typedef forward declaration issue is to use inheritance: class XList : public QList<X>{};. QList has a non-virtual destructor. Given the fact that Qt's own QStringList inherits QList<QString> and I'm not allocating XLists on the heap, do you see any problems with this workaround? Should I explicitly disallow heap allocations for the XList classes?

---

Let's have a look at what will happen if we define XList this way:

class XList : public QList<X> {};

The following will work as expected:

  XList* x = new XList;
  delete x;

However the following won't:

  QList<X>* q = new XList;
  delete q;

QList<X>'s destructor will be called but not XList's, if any. That's what a virtual destructor in the base class will do for you.

If you never use heap allocations you should be fine, but you're preparing a trap for the maintainer following you (or even yourself in a few months).

Make sure this assumption is documented and make XList's new operator private to prevent heap instantiation as you mentioned.

The safe alternative would be making QList<X> a member of your XList, that is: prefer encapsulation to inheritance.

---

QStringList doesn't define its own destructor. In this case, even if QList was used polymorphically (see blue.tuxedo's example), there isn't a problem since even though the derived class destructor won't get called, there isn't one defined.

In your case, if you require a destructor in your derived class (XList), you'll run into problems. There was a previous discussion about how to get around not being able to forward declare type definitions here:

Forward declaration of a typedef in C++

If you can avoid writing a derived class, you might be better off in the long run.