开发者

Integrate stiff ODEs with Python

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-17 12:50 出处:网络
I\'m looking for a good library that will integrate stiff ODEs in Python. The issue is, scipy\'s odeint g开发者_开发百科ives me good solutions sometimes, but the slightest change in the initial condit

I'm looking for a good library that will integrate stiff ODEs in Python. The issue is, scipy's odeint g开发者_开发百科ives me good solutions sometimes, but the slightest change in the initial conditions causes it to fall down and give up. The same problem is solved quite happily by MATLAB's stiff solvers (ode15s and ode23s), but I can't use it (even from Python, because none of the Python bindings for the MATLAB C API implement callbacks, and I need to pass a function to the ODE solver). I'm trying PyGSL, but it's horrendously complex. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

EDIT: The specific problem I'm having with PyGSL is choosing the right step function. There are several of them, but no direct analogues to ode15s or ode23s (bdf formula and modified Rosenbrock if that makes sense). So what is a good step function to choose for a stiff system? I have to solve this system for a really long time to ensure that it reaches steady-state, and the GSL solvers either choose a miniscule time-step or one that's too large.


If you can solve your problem with Matlab's ode15s, you should be able to solve it with the vode solver of scipy. To simulate ode15s, I use the following settings:

ode15s = scipy.integrate.ode(f)
ode15s.set_integrator('vode', method='bdf', order=15, nsteps=3000)
ode15s.set_initial_value(u0, t0)

and then you can happily solve your problem with ode15s.integrate(t_final). It should work pretty well on a stiff problem.

(See also Link)


Python can call C. The industry standard is LSODE in ODEPACK. It is public-domain. You can download the C version. These solvers are extremely tricky, so it's best to use some well-tested code.

Added: Be sure you really have a stiff system, i.e. if the rates (eigenvalues) differ by more than 2 or 3 orders of magnitude. Also, if the system is stiff, but you are only looking for a steady-state solution, these solvers give you the option of solving some of the equations algebraically. Otherwise, a good Runge-Kutta solver like DVERK will be a good, and much simpler, solution.

Added here because it would not fit in a comment: This is from the DLSODE header doc:

C     T     :INOUT  Value of the independent variable.  On return it
C                   will be the current value of t (normally TOUT).
C
C     TOUT  :IN     Next point where output is desired (.NE. T).

Also, yes Michaelis-Menten kinetics is nonlinear. The Aitken acceleration works with it, though. (If you want a short explanation, first consider the simple case of Y being a scalar. You run the system to get 3 Y(T) points. Fit an exponential curve through them (simple algebra). Then set Y to the asymptote and repeat. Now just generalize to Y being a vector. Assume the 3 points are in a plane - it's OK if they're not.) Besides, unless you have a forcing function (like a constant IV drip), the MM elimination will decay away and the system will approach linearity. Hope that helps.


PyDSTool wraps the Radau solver, which is an excellent implicit stiff integrator. This has more setup than odeint, but a lot less than PyGSL. The greatest benefit is that your RHS function is specified as a string (typically, although you can build a system using symbolic manipulations) and is converted into C, so there are no slow python callbacks and the whole thing will be very fast.


I am currently studying a bit of ODE and its solvers, so your question is very interesting to me...

From what I have heard and read, for stiff problems the right way to go is to choose an implicit method as a step function (correct me if I am wrong, I am still learning the misteries of ODE solvers). I cannot cite you where I read this, because I don't remember, but here is a thread from gsl-help where a similar question was asked.

So, in short, seems like the bsimp method is worth taking a shot, although it requires a jacobian function. If you cannot calculate the Jacobian, I will try with rk2imp, rk4imp, or any of the gear methods.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消