开发者

Validate presence of one field or another (XOR)

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-17 07:06 出处:网络
How do I validate the presence of one field or another but not both a开发者_StackOverflownd at least one ?Your code will work if you add conditionals to the numericality validations like so:

How do I validate the presence of one field or another but not both a开发者_StackOverflownd at least one ?


Your code will work if you add conditionals to the numericality validations like so:

class Transaction < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates_presence_of :date
  validates_presence_of :name

  validates_numericality_of :charge, allow_nil: true
  validates_numericality_of :payment, allow_nil: true

  validate :charge_xor_payment

  private

  def charge_xor_payment
    return if charge.blank? ^ payment.blank?

    errors.add(:base, 'Specify a charge or a payment, not both')
  end
end


I think this is more idiomatic in Rails:

e.g: For validating that one of user_name or email is present:

validates :user_name, presence: true, unless: ->(user) { user.email.present? }
validates :email, presence: true, unless: ->(user) { user.user_name.present? }


class Transaction < ActiveRecord::Base
    validates_presence_of :date
    validates_presence_of :name

    validates_numericality_of :charge, allow_nil: true
    validates_numericality_of :payment, allow_nil: true


    validate :charge_xor_payment

  private

    def charge_xor_payment
      if [charge, payment].compact.count != 1
        errors.add(:base, "Specify a charge or a payment, not both")
      end
    end

end

You can even do this with 3 or more values:

if [month_day, week_day, hour].compact.count != 1


Example for rails 3.

class Transaction < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates_presence_of :date
  validates_presence_of :name

  validates_numericality_of :charge, :unless => proc{|obj| obj.charge.blank?}
  validates_numericality_of :payment, :unless => proc{|obj| obj.payment.blank?}


  validate :charge_xor_payment

  private

    def charge_xor_payment
      if !(charge.blank? ^ payment.blank?)
        errors[:base] << "Specify a charge or a payment, not both"
      end
    end
end


Validation using a Proc or Symbol with :if and :unless will get called right before validation happens.

So presence one of both fields may be like this:

validates :charge,
  presence: true,
  if: ->(user){user.charge.present? || user.payment.present?}
validates :payment,
  presence: true,
  if: ->(user){user.payment.present? || user.charge.present?}

The (example snippet) code has :if or :unless as latest item, however as declared in doc it will get called right before validation happens - so another checking will works after, if condition match.


 validate :father_or_mother

#Father last name or Mother last name is compulsory

 def father_or_mother
        if father_last_name == "Last Name" or father_last_name.blank?
           errors.add(:father_last_name, "cant blank")
           errors.add(:mother_last_name, "cant blank")
        end
 end

Try above simple example.


I put my answer to this question below. In this example :description and :keywords are fields which one of this not be blank:

  validate :some_was_present

  belongs_to :seo_customable, polymorphic: true

  def some_was_present
    desc = description.blank?
    errors.add(desc ? :description : :keywords, t('errors.messages.blank')) if desc && keywords.blank?
  end
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消