开发者

SubSonic-based app that connects to multiple databases

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-17 01:35 出处:网络
I currently developed an app that connects to SQL Server 200开发者_Python百科5 database, so my DAL objects where generated using information from that DB.

I currently developed an app that connects to SQL Server 200开发者_Python百科5 database, so my DAL objects where generated using information from that DB.

It will also be possible to connect to an Oracle and MySQL db, all with the same table structures (aside from the normal differences in fields, such as varbinary(max) in SQL Server and BLOB in Oracle, and so on). For this purpose, I already defined multiple connection strings and multiple SubSonic providers for the different DB's the app will run on.

My question is, if I generated my objects using a SQL Server database, should the generated objects work transparently with the other DB's or do I need to generate a different DAL for each database engine I use? Should I be aware of any possible bugs I may encounter while performing these operations?

Thanks in advance for any advice on this issue.


I'm using SubSonic 2.2 by the way....

From what I've been able to test so far, I can't see an easy way to achieve what I'm trying to do.

The ideal situation for me would have been to generate SubSonic objects using SQL Server for example, and just be able to switch dynamically to MySQL by just creating at runtime the correct Provider for it along with its connection string. I got to a point where my app would correctly connect from SQL Server to a MySQL DB, but there's a point where the app fails since SubSonic internally generates queries of the form

SELECT * FROM dbo.MyTable

which MySQL doesn't support obviously. I also noticed queries that enclosed table names with brackets ([]), so it seems that there are a number of factors that would limit the use of one Provider along multiple DB engines.

I guess my only other option is to sort it out with multiple generated providers, although I must admit it does not make me comfortable knowing that I'll have N copies of basically the same classes along my project.

I would really love to hear from anyone else if they've had similar experiences. I'll be sure to post my results once I get everything sorted out and working for my project.

Has any of this changed in 3.0? This would definitely be a worthy reason for me to upgrade if life is any easier on this matter...

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消