Employee is a sample entity type.
var r1 = (from c in _ctx select c).Skip(5).Take(5);
// my intent is to pull the first reco开发者_Python百科rd from the query
var r2 = (from c in _ctx select c).FirstOrDefault<Employee>();
// my intent is to pull the last record from the query.
// any good way to ask for the result back in the reverse
// order of the natural sort without specifing a field/property name?
var r3 = (from c in _ctx select c).LastOrDefault<Employee>();
Do these pull back the entire records (objects) and then filter? What is the best way to write these so that the whole line is a LINQ expression?
I believe that (assuming _ctx
is a DataContext
) the SQL generated will be mildly efficient.
Can I suggest that you run SQL Server Profiler while you run these bits of code?
I think the query for r2
will be a simple SELECT TOP (1)
statement.
r1
has a chance of being efficient with:
SELECT TOP(5) [fields]
FROM (
SELECT TOP (10) [fields]
FROM [table]
ORDER BY [identitycol] DESC
)
r3
looks like it may just select all and take the last record.
Try Profiler and see :)
If you use IQueryable that means that you create a expression tree that will be run in the remote source
See What is the difference between IQueryable<T> and IEnumerable<T>?
Good books tools c# 3.0 in a NutShell,LinqPad, LINQ in Action
- It filters records within database since
IQueryable
is used. However, @Codesleuth can be right concerningr3
. - The most pretty-looking way is
_ctx.Employees.Skip(5).Take(5)
, because there is no query alternative to method calls ofSkip
,Take
,First
, etc.
How do you know what the last record is? What determines the order? Can't you make a call to OrderByDescending and then take the FirstOrDefault? Perhaps that would yield a quicker query.
精彩评论