Determining the quantity of elements in a C array

When print_array is called, the size of the int array[] parameter (count) isn't what was expected. It seems sizeof is not returning the size of the entire array which would be 5*sizeof(开发者_开发技巧int) = 20.

namespace Util
{
   void print_array(int array[])
   {
      size_t count = (sizeof array)/(sizeof array[0]);
      cout << count;
      // int count = sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0]);
      // for (int i = 0; i <= count; i++) cout << array[i];
   }
}


int array_test[5]={2,1,5,4,3};
Util::print_array(array_test);

---

int array[] here becomes int* array, and sizeof(array) returns the same thing sizeof(int*). You need to pass an array by reference to avoid that.

template <size_t N>
void print_array(int (&array)[N]) {
    std::cout << N;
}

int array[] = { 2, 1, 5, 4, 3 };
print_array(array);

---

Read this: it says the way to fix this, but for a quick description:

When a function has a specific-size array parameter, why is it replaced with a pointer?

Using sizeof(array) will work in the scope that the array is statically defined in. When you pass it into a function though the type gets converted into a pointer to the array element type. In your case, when you're in print_array it is an int*. So, your sizeof in in the function will be the size of a pointer on your system (likely 32 or 64 bits).

You can get around this with some fancy syntax like so (from the link above):

If you want that the array type is preserved, you should pass in a reference to the array:

void foo ( int(&array)[5] );

but I'd say just pass the size in as well as another parameter, its more readable.

---

As this array is implemented as a thin overlay on pointers, the variable you have is just a pointer, so sizeof will return the size of your pointer.

The only way to know the length of an array is to place a terminating object, as the null character in C strings.

There is no other way to determine the size of an array if you only have a pointer to it.

---

Here's a trick: you can take a reference to an array of fixed size. You can use this to template-deduce the size.

#include <iostream>

char a [22];
char b [33];

void foo (char *, size_t size)
{
    std :: cout << size << "\n";
}

template <size_t N>
void foo (char (&x) [N])
{
    foo (x, N);
}

int main () {
    foo (a);
    foo (b);
}

This prints 22\n33\n

---

void print_array( int array[] ) is synonymous with void print_array( int *array ). No size information is passed when the function call is made, so sizeof doesn't work here.

---

For an algorithm like this, I like to use iterators, then you can do what you want... e.g.

template <typename Iterator>
void print(Interator begin, Iterator end)
{
  std::cout << "size: " << std::distance(begin, end) << std::endl;
  std::copy(begin, end, std::ostream_iterator<std::iterator_traits<Iterator>::value_type>(std::cout, ", "));
}

to call

print(a, a + 5); // can calculate end using the sizeof() stuff...

---

just an addition to all the answers already posted:

if you want to use an array which is more comfortable (like an ArrayList in java for instance) then just use the stl-vector container which is also able to return its size

---

All the following declarations are exactly same:

void print_array(int array[]);
void print_array(int array[10]);
void print_array(int array[200]);
void print_array(int array[1000]);
void print_array(int *array);

That means, sizeof(array) would return the value of sizeof(int*), in all above cases, even in those where you use integers (they're ignored by the compiler, in fact).

However, all the following are different from each other, and co-exist in a program, at the same time:

void print_array(int (&array)[10]);
void print_array(int (&array)[200]);
void print_array(int (&array)[1000]);

int a[10], b[200], c[1000], d[999];
print_array(a); //ok - calls the first function
print_array(b); //ok - calls the second function
print_array(c); //ok - calls the third function
print_array(d); //error - no function accepts int array of size 999