In certain scenario like a MVVM view-model, I sometimes needs to have private setter as the view-model exposes a state that can only be modified internally.
So is this wrong to need a private setter on an interface?开发者_C百科 (and I mean not particularly in the described scenario) If not, why does the C# compiler does not allow it?
Thanks.
By definition, an interface is a contract for other code to use, not for private members. However, you can specify read-only properties in interfaces and implement a private setter in the concrete class:
public interface IFoo
{
string MyReadonlyString { get; }
}
public class FooImplementation : IFoo
{
public string MyReadonlyString { get; private set; }
}
精彩评论