I have an interesting problem that seems to be unresolved by my research on the internet. I'm trying to load libraries dynamically in my c++ project with the functions from dlfcn.h. The problem is that when I try to reload the plugins at running time (because I made a change on any of them), the main program crashes (Segmentation fault (core dumped)) when dlclose() is called. Here is my example that reproduces the error:
main.cpp:
#include <iostream>
#include <dlfcn.h>
#include <time.h>
#include "IPlugin.h"
int main( )
{
void * lib_handle;
char * error;
while( true )
{
std::cout << "Updating the .so" << std::endl;
lib_handle = dlopen( "./test1.so", RTLD_LAZY );
if ( ! lib_handle )
{
std::cerr << dlerror( ) << std::endl;
return 1;
}
create_t fn_create = ( create_t ) dlsym( lib_handle, "create" );
if ( ( error = dlerror( ) ) != NULL )
{
std::cerr << error << std::endl;
return 1;
}
IPlugin * ik = fn_create( );
ik->exec( );
destroy_t fn_destroy = ( destroy_t ) dlsym( lib_handle, "destroy" );
fn_destroy( ik );
std::cout << "Waiting 5 seconds before unloading..." << std::endl;
sleep( 5 );
dlclose( lib_handle );
}
return 0;
}
IPlugin.h:
class IPlugin
{
public:
IPlugin( ) { }
virtual ~IPlugin( ) { }
virtual void exec( ) = 0;
};
typedef IPlugin * ( * create_t )( );
typedef void ( * destroy_t )( IPlugin * );
Test1.h:
#include <iostream>
#include "IPlugin.h"
class Test1 : public IPlugin
{
public:
Test1( );
virtual ~Test1( );
void exec( );
};
Test1.cpp:
#include "Test1.h"
Test1::Test1( ) { }
Test1::~Test1( ) { }
void Test1::exec( )
{
std::cout << "void Test1::exec( )" << std::endl;
}
extern "C"
IPlugin * create( )
{
return new Test1( );
}
extern "C"
void destroy( IPlugin * plugin )
{
if( plugin != NULL )
{
delete plugin;
}
}
To compile:
g++ main.cpp -o main -ldl
g++ -shared -fPIC Test1.cpp -o plugin/test1.so
The problem occurs when for example I change something on the Test1::exec method (changing the string to be printed or commenting the line) and while the main program sleeps I copy the new test1.so to main running directory (cp). If I use the move command (mv), no error occurs. What makes the difference between using cp or mv? Is there any way to solve this开发者_开发知识库 problem or to do that using cp?
I'm using Fedora 14 with g++ (GCC) 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1-4).
Thanks in advance.
The difference between cp
and mv
that is pertinent to this question is as follows:
cp
opens the destination file and writes the new contents into it. It therefore replaces the old contents with the new contents.mv
doesn't touch the contents of the original file. Instead, it makes the directory entry point to the new file.
This turns out to be important. While the application is running, the OS keeps open handles to the executable and the shared objects. When it needs to consult one of the these files, it uses the relevant handle to access the file's contents.
- If you've used
cp
, the contents has now been corrupted, so anything can happen (a segfault is a pretty likely outcome). - If you've used
mv
, the open file handle still refers to the original file, which continues to exist on disk even though there's no longer a directory entry for it.
If you've used mv
to replace the shared object, you should be able to dlclose
the old one and dlopen
the new one. However, this is not something that I've done or would recommend.
Try this:
extern "C"
void destroy( IPlugin * plugin )
{
if( plugin != NULL && dynamic_cast<Test1*>(plugin))
{
delete static_cast<Test1*>(plugin);
}
}
精彩评论