Having two simple classes taking Int
as an a开发者_JAVA技巧rgument:
case class Foo(i: Int)
class Bar(j: Int)
I can say:
List(1,2,3) map Foo
Which works fine and is equivalent to a bit more verbose:
List(1,2,3) map {Foo(_)}
However Bar
(because it is not a case class?) cannot be used in the same construct:
List(1,2,3) map Bar
error: not found: value Bar
List(1,2,3) map Bar
^
Is there some special syntax to reference any constructor and take advantage of eta expansion? List(1,2,3) map {new Bar(_)}
seems a bit more verbose compared to Foo
.
It works in the former case, because companion object of a case class extends appropriate FunctionN
trait. (object Foo extends (Int => Foo)
in your example.) For non-case classes, you could do this manually:
scala> class Bar(i: Int)
defined class Bar
scala> class Bar(i: Int); object Bar extends (Int => Bar) { def apply(i: Int) = new Bar(i) }
defined class Bar
defined module Bar
scala> List(2, 3) map Bar
res17: List[Bar] = List(Bar@1f99e90, Bar@1191056)
IMO it's better to go with new Bar(_)
as this extra boilerplate might not be worth the little concision achieved.
Since Foo
is a case class there is also a companion object called Foo
, which implements the Function1
interface (had the constructor taken three arguments it would have been the Function3
interface).
精彩评论