Please find my code below, I have used to call move constructor (code Inspired from other sites)and let me know whats wrong with it, I am using GCC 4.5.3
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
class Int_Smart_Pointer {
int *m_p;
public:
Int_Smart_Pointer() {
std::cout<<"Derfault Constructor"<< std::endl;
m_p = NULL;
}
explicit Int_Smart_Pointer(int n) {
std::cout<<"Explicit Constructor: " << n <<std::endl;
m_p = new int(n);
}
Int_Smart_Pointer(const Int_Smart_Pointer& other) {
std::cout<<"Copy Constructor: "<<std::endl;
if(other.m_p)
m_p = new int(*other.m_p);
else
m_p = NULL;
}
Int_Smart_Pointer(Int_Smart_Pointer&& other) {
std::cout<<"Move Constructor: "<<std::endl;
m_p = other.m_p;
other.m_p = NULL;
}
Int_Smart_Pointer& operator=(const Int_Smart_Pointer& other) {
std::cout<<"Copy Assignment"<< std::endl;
if(this != &other) {
delete m_p;
if(other.m_p)
m_p = new int(*other.m_p);
else
m_p = NULL;
}
return *this;
}
Int_Smart_Pointer& operator=(Int_Smart_Pointer&& other) {
std::cout<<"Move Assignment"<< std::endl;
if(this != &other) {
delete m_p;
m_p = other.m_p;
other.m_p = NULL;
}
return *this;
}
~Int_Smart_Pointer() {
std::cout<<"Default Destructor"<< std::endl;
delete m_p;
}
int get() const{
if(m_p)
return *m_p;
else
return 0;
}
};
Int_Smart_Pointer square(const Int_Smart_Pointer& r) {
const int i = r.get();
return Int_Smart_Pointer(i * i);
}
Int_Smart_Pointer getMove_Constructor() {
return Int_Smart_Pointer(100);
}
int main()
{
Int_Smart_Pointer a(10);
Int_Smart_Pointer b(a);
b = square(a);
std::cout<< std::endl;
Int_Smart_Pointer c(30);
Int_Smart_Pointer d(square(c)); //Move constructor Should be called (rvalue)
std::cout<< std::endl;
Int_Smart_Pointer e(getMove_Constructor()); //Move constructor Should be called (rvalue)
std::cout<< std::endl;
std::vector<Int_Smart_Pointer> ptr_vec;
ptr_vec.push_back(getMove_Constructor());
ptr_vec.push_back(getMove_Constructor());
std::cout<< std::endl;
return 0;
}
And the output is
Explicit Constructor: 10
Copy Constructor:
Explicit Constructor: 100
Move Assignment
Default Destructor
Explicit Constructor: 30
Explicit Constructor: 900
Explicit Constructor: 100
Explicit Constructor: 100
Move Constructor:
Default Destructor
Explicit Constructor: 100
Move Constructor:
Move Constructor:
Default Destructor
Default Destructor
Default Destructor
Default Destructor
Default Destructor
Default Destructor
Default Destructor
Default Destructor
Default Destructor
开发者_高级运维When we use std::move while constructing, it is calling move constructor.
Int_Smart_Pointer d(std::move(square(c))); //used std::move and Move constructor called
Int_Smart_Pointer e(std::move(getMove_Constructor())); //used std::move works as above
But even if we do not use, gerMove_Constructor and square return values becomes rvalue while constructing object as we can not find address space or reference to them,
Please let me know if something is wrong in my understanding, if not then why move constructor is not called.
Thanks In Advance. Satya
When returning a local variable by value, the compiler is still allowed to elide copy constructors as in C++03 (return value optimization).
Obviously, a constructor taking an int
must be called inside square
and getMove_Constructor
.
Apparently, in Int_Smart_Pointer d(square(c))
and Int_Smart_Pointer e(getMove_Constructor())
, no other constructors are called, as they can be optimized away by the compiler.
精彩评论