Coding myself into a corner

We've got a set of classes which derive from a common set of interfaces such that

IFoo-> BasicF开发者_运维技巧oo, ReverseFoo, ForwardFoo
IBar -> UpBar, DownBar, SidewaysBar
IYelp -> Yip, Yap, Yup

wherein the constructor for the Foo's looks like Foo(IBar, IYelp) These items are used throughout the project.

There exists another class which has a method whose signature is public double CalcSomething(IFoo, IAnotherClass) that is applied at some point to each and every Foo. We've had a request come down from above that one particular object composition, let's say a BasicFoo(UpBar,Yip), use a different algorithm other than the one found in CalcSomething.

My first instinct was to say let's change the IFoo interface so we can move the logic down to the Foo class level, change the constructor to be Foo(IBar, IYelp, IStrategy) and then have the Foo objects encapsulate this logic. Unfortunately we've also been told the design of the architecture stipulates that there be no dependencies between IFoo, it's implementations and IAnotherClass. They're adamant about this.

Ok, sure, then I thought I might use a visitor pattern but... how? The whole point of making the composition was so that no other class could see the implementation details. Reflection to look inside the objects, totally breaking encapsulation? Oh hell no.

So I've come here because I'm at a loss. Does anyone have any suggestions how we could treat a special case of one of the compositions without modifying the composition or breaking encapsulation? There has got to be a simple solution I'm over-looking.

Edit:

Removed offending beginning. Changed "handled specially" into a more descriptive meaning.

---

A CalculationFactory that chooses an appropriate algorithm based on the type of IFoo you provide would solve the problem (at the cost of a conditional):

interface ICalcSomethingStrategy {
    public double CalcSomething(IFoo, IAnotherClass);
}

CalcSomethingStrategyFactory {
    ICalcSomethingStrategy CreateCalcSomethingStrategy(IFoo foo) {
        // I'm not sure whether this is the idiomatic java way to check types D:
        if (foo.Bar instanceof UpBar && foo instanceof Yip) {
            return new UnusualCalcSomethingStrategy();
        } else {
            return new StandardCalcSomethingStrategy();
        }
    }
}

---

In the spirit of KISS I would add a method isSpecial() to IFoo, and use that to decide which algorithm to use in CalcSomething().

This assumes that this is the only special case.

---

There's no way for calcSomething to avoid having the knowledge needed to do the "special" behavior, but other than that, you can maintain most of your encapsulation this way.

Create a marker interface IQualifyForSpecialTreatment which extends IFoo. Extend BasicFoo to SpecialBasicFoo, and have it implement IQualifyForSpecialTreatment.

    interface IQualifyForSpecialTreatment extends IFoo {
    }
    class SpecialBasicFoo extends BasicFoo implements IQualifyForSpecialTreatment {
        ...
    }

You can then add another flavor of calcSomething:

    calcSomething (IQualifyForSpecialTreatment foo, IAnotherClass whatever) {
        ... perform "special" variant of calculation
    }
    calcSomething (IFoo foo, IAnotherClass whatever) {
        ... perform "normal" variant of calculation
    }