I am trying to implement caching mechanism for entities. And to use the entities correctly and seamlessly with the caching i need to detach the entity from the current context before i put it in a cache and attach it back the the new context when i get it from the cache. (My context lifetime is per http request)
The requirements are that -
- All the navigational properties that are associated with it (which i have already populated) should not be removed when the entity is detached.
- I can update the cached items if i want ( so correctly attaching them to the new context is important).
This is my attempt at creating an EntityCache class - (ServerCache here is my wrapper class that pushes the object to ASP.NET cache)
public static class EntityCache
{
private static DbContext context
{
get
{
return (DbContext)HttpContext.Current.Items[ObjectKeys.ContextRequestItemKey];
}
}
private static void Detach(object entity)
{
var trackedEntity = entity as IEntityWithChangeTracker;
trackedEntity.SetChangeTracker(null);
((IObjectContextAdapter)context).ObjectContext.Detach(entity);
}
private static void Attach(object entity)
{
((IObjectContextAdapter)context).ObjectContext.Attach((IEntityWithKey)entity);
}
public static void Remove(string key)
{
ServerCache.Remove(key);
}
public static object Get(string key)
{
object output = ServerCache.Get(key);
if (output != null)
Attach(output);
return output;
}
public static void ShortCache(String key, object data)
{
if (data != null)
{
Detach(data);
ServerCache.ShortCache(key, data);
}
}
public static void LongCache(String key, object data)
{
if (data != null)
{
Detach(data);
ServerCache.LongCache(key, data);
}
}
}
When i put an entity in the cache it is of type开发者_开发知识库 DynamicProxy and NOT the real class.
Attaching doesnt work at all - i get an exception that i cannot case object that is of type Dynamic_{blahblah} to IEntityWithKey.
I just saw these examples of attach and detach online and tried them, I am open to any new implementation of the Attach/Detach methods here.
Thank you.
Follow up question -
context.Entry(entity).State = EntityState.Detached;
Works, but makes all the navigational properties that are loaded NULL, how do we make it keep the navigational properties and NOT replace(or lose) them with NULL when we detach from context.
IEntityWithKey
is interface for other types of entities. It is for "big" entities. For example EntityObject
implement this interface. These entities are not considered as POCO and are not supported by DbContext
API.
If you want to use IEntityWithKey
your classes must implement it - it is not something that would happen automatically.
Correct attaching with DbContext
API should be:
dbContext.Set(typeof(entity)).Attach(entity);
and this should hopefully also work:
dbContext.Entry(entity).State = EntityState.Unchanged;
Correct detaching with DbContext
API should be:
dbContext.Entry(entity).State = EntityState.Detached;
Also it is better to you generic methods instead of object
.
To your follow-up question:
...how do we make it keep the navigational properties and NOT replace(or lose) them with NULL when we detach from context...
I believe it's not possible to detach an object graph from the context while maintaining it's navigation properties. From MSDN:
In an independent association, the relationship information is not maintained for a detached object.
Although this statement is about independent associations it does not mean that navigation properties are maintained in foreign key assocation (relationships which expose a foreign key property in the model). Yes, "Relationship information" is maintained because the foreign key properties (which are scalar properties) will be alive and contain the correct foreign key value after detaching. But the corresponding navigation properties will still be null
for reference properties or, for navigation collections the reference will be removed from the collection.
I think the only way to detach a complete object graph from a context is either disposing the context altogether or create a copy of the graph before starting to detach the original graph. Creating a copy would require writing Clone
methods which copy all the properties and navigate through the graph or using a "trick" like this which serializes the graph into a binary stream and then deserializes it back to new objects. For this the entities would need to be serializable. Also reference cycles (which we often have when using bidirectional navigation properties between entities) can cause trouble. (Also attention if your objects are proxies which contain references to EF's internal objects and which you probably don't want to copy, serialize and deserialize.)
In this aspect Detach
is not the counterpart of Attach
because it behaves quite differently: Attach
attaches the whole object graph and maintains navigation properties. Detach
detaches only single entities without the related objects and destroys navigation properties. From the same page linked above:
Detach only affects the specific object passed to the method. If the object being detached has related objects in the object context, those objects are not detached.
I could imagine that this is the main reason why the DbContext
API doesn't have an explicite Detach
method (in contrast to ObjectContext
) - detaching is considered as an advanced feature which does not behave as one might expect.
MSDN mentions as the only reason to detach an object from the context "to conserve resources" (again the article above):
In Entity Framework applications, you can detach objects from the object context. You might detach objects to conserve resources, as executing repeated queries in the same object context increases the memory requirements of the object context.
I think this method is just not prepared and designed for working with the objects after they've been detached from the context. It's main purpose is to release them for immediate garbage collection.
精彩评论