PortfolioEngine::Portfolio Load (0.3ms) SELECT "portfolio_engine_portfolios".* FROM "portfolio_engine_portfolios" INNER JOIN "portfolio_engine_items" ON "portfolio_engine_items"."portfolio_id" = "portfolio_engine_portfolios"."id" ORDER BY portfolio_engine_portfolios.sort_index ASC, portfolio_engine_portfolios.sort_index ASC, portfolio_engine_items.sort_index ASC
PortfolioEngine::Item Load (0.2ms) SELECT "portfolio_engine_items".* FROM "portfolio_engine_items" WHERE "portfolio_engine_items"."portfolio_id" = 2 ORDER BY portfolio_engine_items.sort_index ASC, sort_index asc
PortfolioEngine::Item Load (0.3ms) SELECT "portfolio_engine_items".* FROM "portfolio_engine_items" WHERE "portfolio_engine_items"."portfolio_id" = 3 ORDER BY portfolio_engine_items.sort_index ASC, sort_index asc
PortfolioEngine::Item Load (0.2ms) SELECT "portfolio_engine_items".* FROM "portfolio_engine_items" WHERE "portfolio_engine_items"."portfolio_id" = 1 ORDER BY portfolio_engine_items.sort_index ASC, sort_index asc
The n+1 is triggered by looping through each portfolio's items.
class Portfolio < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :items,
order: "portfolio_engine_items.sort_index asc",
autosave: true,
inverse_of: :portfolio
default_scope :order => 'portfolio_engine_portfolios.sort_index ASC'
end
class Item < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :portfolio
belongs_to :client
has_many :images,
order: "sort_index ASC",
autosave: true,
inverse_of: :item
end
I have no idea, why this happens....
@开发者_如何学运维portfolios = PortfolioEngine::Portfolio.
joins(:items).
order("portfolio_engine_portfolios.sort_index ASC, portfolio_engine_items.sort_index ASC").
all
Have you tried includes
instead of joins
?
精彩评论