开发者

Thinking Sphinx and acts_as_taggable_on plugin

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-16 12:20 出处:网络
I installed Sphinx and Thinking Sphinx for ruby on rails 2.3.2. When I search without conditions search works ok. Now, what I\'d like to do is filter by tags, so, as I\'m using the acts_as_taggable_o

I installed Sphinx and Thinking Sphinx for ruby on rails 2.3.2.

When I search without conditions search works ok. Now, what I'd like to do is filter by tags, so, as I'm using the acts_as_taggable_on plugin, my Announcement model looks like this:

class Announcement < ActiveRecord::Base

  acts_as_taggable_on :tags,:category

  define_index do
    indexes title, :as => :title, :sortable => true
    indexes description, :as => :description, :sortable => true
    indexes tags.name, :as => :tags
    indexes category.name, :as => :category

    has category(:id), :as => :category_ids
    has tags(:id), :as => :tag_ids
  end

For some reason, when I run the following command, it will bring just one announcement, that has nothing to do with what I expect. I've got many announcements, so I expected a lot of results instead.

Announcement.search params[:announcement][:search].to_s, :with => {:tag_ids => 1}, :page => params[:page], :per_page => 10

I guess something is wrong, and it's not searching correctly.

Can anyone give my a clue of wh开发者_开发问答at's going on?

Thanks, Brian


Thinking Sphinx relies on associations in model. In common situations you only have to put index definition below your associations.

With acts_as_taggable_on plug-in you don't have tag-related associations in model file and when you write

indexes tags.name, :as => :tags

TS interprets it like:

CAST(`announcements`.`name` AS CHAR) AS `tags`

(look at sql_query in development.sphinx.conf, in my case). I suppose that you have attribute name in model Announcement and don't run into error when rebuild index.

But we expect:

CAST(GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT IFNULL(`tags`.`name`, '0') SEPARATOR ' ') AS CHAR) AS `tags`

and:

LEFT OUTER JOIN `taggings` ON (`announcements`.`id` = `taggings`.`taggable_id`)  
LEFT OUTER JOIN `tags` ON (`tags`.`id` = `taggings`.`tag_id`) AND taggings.taggable_type = 'Announcement'

To get things working just add tag-related associations in your model before you rebuild index:

class Announcement < ActiveRecord::Base

  acts_as_taggable_on :tags,:category

  has_many :taggings, :as => :taggable, :dependent => :destroy, :include => :tag, :class_name => "ActsAsTaggableOn::Tagging",
            :conditions => "taggings.taggable_type = 'Announcement'"
  #for context-dependent tags:
  has_many :category_tags, :through => :taggings, :source => :tag, :class_name => "ActsAsTaggableOn::Tag",
          :conditions => "taggings.context = 'categories'"

In define_index method:

indexes category_tags(:name), :as => :tags
has category_tags(:id), :as => :tag_ids, :facet => true

In controller:

@announcement_facets = Announcement.facets params[:search], :with => {:tag_ids => [...]} 
@announcements = @announcement_facets.for.paginate( :page => params[:page], :per_page => 10 )


I found that simply defining the index thus:

Class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base    

acts_as_taggable

     define_index do
        ..other indexing...
        indexes taggings.tag.name, :as => :tags
     end
end

worked fine.


One possibility is that you need to declare the type for tag_ids as :multi because TS can get confused (I just discovered this here http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx/browse_thread/thread/9bd4572398f35712/14d4c1503f5959a9?lnk=gst&q=yanowitz#14d4c1503f5959a9).

But why not use the tag names to search? E.g.,

Announcement.search params[:announcement][:search].to_s, :conditions => {:tags => "my_tag"}, :page => params[:page], :per_page => 10

Or, if you need to search for multiple tags:

Announcement.search( "#{params[:announcement][:search].to_s} (@tags my_tag | @tags your_tag)", :page => params[:page], :per_page => 10 )

(as aside, you may want to sanitize/remove sphinx-control-characters from the user-provided query before using it).

For debugging, I would go into console and strip down your query as much as possible (eliminate pagination arguments, even the query (just do ""), etc.).

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消