开发者

PostgreSQL 8.3 - issues with autovacuum [closed]

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-04-07 04:31 出处:网络
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.

Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.

Closed 11 years ago.

Improve this question

I'm trying to encourage the use and monitoring of autovacuum in some PostgreSQL 8.3 databases.

One objection I hit often is that people don't "trust" autovacuum or there are bugs in autovacuum in 8.3 which mean that it's ignored in preference to scheduling vacuuming. Mostly our tables are small and this approach appears to work. However, with our larger (& also heavily updated tables) this really doesn't work (dead tuple counts increase, exceed max_fsm_pages, and the tables don't get cleaned up etc etc).

I'm just wondering if anyone has a reference for autovacuum in 8.3 being buggy or not working. My own experience has shown that autovac works fine and, where necessary, adding entries to the pg_autovacuum table does the tri开发者_开发问答ck but I'm not having any luck convincing anyone else.

I'd like to understand the problem with autovacuum (if one exists).

Thanks

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消