I would like to ensure that var a has not cha开发者_JS百科nged between retrieving it and performing the update on var b.
var a = from item in....
if (a > 100) {
var b = from item in...
b.something = 100;
db.SubmitChanges()
}
How would I go about doing this? Do I just wrap the thing in a TransactionScope?
Linq 2 sql is designed for optimistic concurrency out of the box (what you want is pessimistic) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb399373.aspx
Due to possible deadlocks etc. with locking, I think you better stick to optimistic and handle the conflict resolution. Otherwise, have a look here: LINQ to SQL and Concurrency Issues
精彩评论