Ambiguity between overloaded constructors

Can someone please explain to me why in the following code I get an ambiguous call to the overloaded constructors in Foo if I attempt to instantiate MyFooC? My assumption was that the integer used as a constructor parameter would have been promoted to an unsigned int and been resolved but this is obviously incorrect.

template <typename t> class Foo
{
private:
    t m_Value;
    unsigned int m_Length;

public:
    Foo(const t& Value) :
        m_Value(Value),
        m_Length(0)
    {
    }

    Foo(unsigned int Length) :
        m_Value(static_cast<t>(0)),
        m_Length(Length)
    {
    }
};

int main()
{
Foo<double> MyFooA(32U);
Foo<double> MyFooB(32.0f);
//Foo<double> MyFooC(32);
    re开发者_运维知识库turn 0;
}

---

An int can be converted to both a double and an unsigned; both are considered "widening" conversions, and have equal rank. As a general rule, any time you overload, and one of the overloads is an integral type, it's a good idea to overload on int as well, to be sure of getting what you want, and avoiding ambiguities, when someone tries to pass an integral constant.

BTW: although it is clear in context what you mean, in the C++ standard, "promotion" has a very precise meaning, and does not include a conversion of int to unsigned int.

---

I would assume the problem is that an int could just as easily be converted to a double. I know of no specifications in C++ that dictates an order of preference for implicit casting, so when the compiler sees an int that could go to double or unsigned int, it views the call as ambiguous.