We all know Objective-C method headers carry more information than standard Java method he开发者_Python百科aders....
This poses an issue when modelling using UML...Some method names are uncontrollably quite long...what is the best way to model these methods clearly in a UML class diagram?
Can you condense the method names, or write some Java style header for them?
I'm doing a report for a software system and I am stuck...
I think in some cases Objective-C headers carry less overall information, but they can show the interfaces more clearly.
For example - Using the modern Objective-C runtimes (for Mac OS and iOS) you don't need to declare private iVars, or private methods in the headers - they can be shifted to a category in the implementation file. You can even redeclare properties as readwrite
in the implementation where they are declared as readonly
in the header file.
This means that there is a lot more going on in a class than is shown in the header files, but the public interfaces are clearly defined separately from private implementation - which is a good thing in a UML diagram.
As for long method names - that's part of the convention of Objective-C. You can love it or loathe it (I personally love it). But in terms of writing them methods don't show their parameters. For example: suppose you have a method declared as:
- (NSString *)resultStringWithOptions:(NSDictionary *)options withCharacterSet(NSCharacterSet *)charSet error:(NSError **)error:
The actual name of this method is:
resultStringWithOptions:withCharacterSet:error:
Which is shorter.
精彩评论