Int32 vs Int64 performance on a 64 bit platform?

My question is relatively simply. On 32bit platforms it's best to use Int32 as opposed to short or long due to to the cpu processing 32 bits at a time. So on a 64 bit architecture does this mean it's faster to use longs for performance? I created a quick and dirty app that copies int and long arrays to test the benchmarks. Here is the code(I did warn it's dirty):

static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        var lar = new long[256];

        for(int z = 1; z<=256;z++)
        {
            lar[z-1] = z;
        }
        var watch = DateTime.Now;
        for (int z = 0; z < 100000000; z++)
        {
            var lard = new long[256];
            lar.CopyTo(lard, 0);

        }
        var res2 = watch - DateTime.Now;

        var iar = new int[256];

        for (int z = 1; z <= 256; z++)
        {
            iar[z - 1] = z;
   开发者_StackOverflow中文版     }

        watch = DateTime.Now;

        for (int z = 0; z < 100000000; z++)
        {
            var iard = new int[256];
            iar.CopyTo(iar, 0);

        }

        var res1 = watch - DateTime.Now;
        Console.WriteLine(res1);
        Console.WriteLine(res2);


    }

The results it produces make long about 3 times as fast as int. Which makes me curious to whether I should start using longs for counters and such. I also did a similar counter test and long was insignificantly faster. Does anybody have any input on this? I also understand even if longs are faster they will still take up twice as much space.

---

No. It takes longer to do 64-bit on a 32-bit CPU because the CPU can only handle 32-bits at a time. A 64-bit CPU will just ignore the missing 32-bits.

Also, try not to preemptively optimize too much. Only optimize when there is a noticeable bottleneck.

---

There's a similar question on this here: Will using longs instead of ints benefit in 64bit java

Typically, in a real application you're more concerned about cache misses, so this is less of a concern overall.