Can someone explain what is going on here?

Here's the code:

scala> def foo(bar: Unit => String) = {bar}
foo: (bar: (Unit) => String)(Unit) => String

scala> foo(a => a.toString)
res0: (Unit) => String = <function1>

I am guessing a is of type Unit, but isn't Unit an object? Is the Unit class开发者_高级运维 hidden?

---

Unit is an AnyVal, like Int. Its sole member is a literal, written as (). For example:

scala> def foo(bar: Unit => String) = {bar}
foo: (bar: Unit => String)Unit => String

scala> foo(a => a.toString)
res0: Unit => String = <function1>

scala> res0(())
res1: String = ()

---

Working from your examples...

def foo(bar: Unit => String) = {bar}

This defines the foo method, which accepts a function from Unit to String as its sole argument, and simply returns that same argument.

foo(a => a.toString)

a => a.toString defines a function inline. Because the type inferencer knows that a function Unit => String is expected at this location, it infers a to be of type Unit.

This invocation of foo then returns the anonymous function that you just defined.

I'm curious, what exactly were you trying to achieve here? Or were you just exploring Scala's syntax?

---

In Scala Unit is equivalent to Java's void. You have defined a function that accepts another function with no parameters and returns a String.

This is equivalent to def foo(bar: => String); Or def foo(bar: () => String)

In Scala () is a shortcut for Unit

---

The answer given by Kevin Wright is entirely correct, but to break it down further:

The first line is declaring a function called foo. foo takes as its argument another function, bar that itself takes in Unit and returns a String. Generally speaking, Unit in scala has the same meaning that void does in many other languages, so you could say for the most part that bar is a function that takes in no arguments and returns a String.

The body of the foo function simply returns the argument it received. Therefore, scala infers that foo returns a function that takes Unit and returns a String.

The second command calls foo with the function a => a.toString as its argument. a is assumed to be of type Unit. If Unit was an exact analogue to void, this wouldn't work. You can't call toString on the absence of something. However, Unit behaves slightly differently, exactly for situations like this, and a will be given an instance of Unit. This instance won't really be able to do much, but it will be able to have toString called on it. So the result of the second command will be a function that returns the result of toString called on the Unit instance, which is: "()"