Given the following SWIG interface definition:
%module example
%include "arrays_csharp.i"
%apply int INOUT[] {int *x}
struct mystruct
{
int *x;
}
SWIG produces the following (snippet from mystruct.cs):
public int[] x {
set {
examplePINVOKE.mystruct_x_set(swigCPtr, value);
}
get {
IntPtr cPtr = examplePINVOKE.mystruct_x_get(swigCPtr); // Error 1
SWIGTYPE_p_int ret = (cPtr == IntPtr.Zero) ? null : new SWIGTYPE_p_int(cPtr, false);
return r开发者_JAVA百科et; //Error 2
}
}
This causes VS2010 to produce the following two errors:
Error 1 Cannot implicitly convert type 'int[]' to 'System.IntPtr'
Error 2 Cannot implicitly convert type 'LibLinear.SWIG.SWIGTYPE_p_int' to 'int[]'
at the areas marked in the above code snippet.
I developed the interface according to http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/CSharp.html#CSharp_arrays_pinvoke_default_array_marshalling , which only talks about functions but not structures. Should the interface definition for structure members be different?
It might be that it can't handle an array of structs because of the unknown size/layout in memory (which is not a problem for int/double/etc...). Is it possible for you to use a vector of structs instead? I've had no problems passing vectors of structs or custom objects by simply including std_vector.i
and relevant typemaps, eg:
%include "std_vector.i"
%typemap(MyClassVec) std::vector<MyClass>;
精彩评论