When I have a repository with both lightweight and annotated tags, git-for-each-ref
only seems to sort one of the sets. I would like to modify my call to for-each-ref
to get output which sorts all the tags and intermixes them in the output.
For example:
bash-3.2$ git tag | > xargs -I T git log -n 1 --format='%at T' T | > sort -rn | > awk '{print $2}' lwt3 at3 lwt2 at2 lwt1 at1 bash-3.2$ git for-each-ref --sort=-authordate refs/tags | awk '{print $3}' refs/tags/lwt3 refs/tags/lwt2 refs/tags/lwt1 refs/ta开发者_JAVA百科gs/at1 refs/tags/at2 refs/tags/at3 bash-3.2$ git --version git version 1.6.6.80.g2df32
Using -committerdate
or -taggerdate
generates similar output, and the tags are never correctly sorted. When using -*authordate
, or -*committerdate
, the group which is sorted is inverted, while -*taggerdate
sorts nothing.
Is there some other option of which I am unaware? And is this correct behavior? I can see why committerdate or taggerdate would only sort the commits or the tags, respectively, but it seems like authordate ought to do what I want.
Okay, went ahead and verified what I said in my comment:
Only annotated tags create a tab object in the repository, which contains among other things the taggerdate field you're trying to sort on here. Your tags are most likely lightweight tags, and therefore contain no such information.
And for the other half, committerdate and authordate appear to work correctly for me on tags - they're just sorting the commit the tag points to, since there's no information about when the tag itself was created. (And they reverse the sort if and only if you put a - in front)
To have annotated tags and lightweight tags sorted altogether, based on the commit date, I'm using:
git for-each-ref --format='%(*committerdate:raw)%(committerdate:raw) %(refname) %(*objectname) %(objectname)' refs/tags | \
sort -n | awk '{ print $4, $3; }'
This command will list every tag and the associated commit object id, in chronological order.
精彩评论