开发者

For-loop and async callback in node.js?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-04-01 14:58 出处:网络
I\'m new to JavaScript and to node.js. I want to loop through a directory and add all file stat (not other directories) to an array. As you see below there is a problem with my code since the callback

I'm new to JavaScript and to node.js. I want to loop through a directory and add all file stat (not other directories) to an array. As you see below there is a problem with my code since the callback will probably get called after the for loop has finishe开发者_如何学编程d so using the "i"-variable in the callback method will not work. But how should the code look so that the below snippet works? Does it have something to do with closures?

Thanks for help!

    fs.readdir(SYNCDIR, function(err1, files) {
        var filesOnly = [];

        if(!err1) {

            for(var i = 0; i < files.length; i++) {

                var imgFilePath = SYNCDIR + '/' + files[i];
                fs.stat(imgFilePath, function(stat){

                    if (stat.isFile()){
                        filesOnly[i] = stat; // This will not be correct since the for-loop has finished
                    }
                });

            }
        }
    });


You are right about needing to use a closure. You should wrap the contents of the for loop in a self-invoking function to preserve the value of i for each iteration.

fs.readdir(SYNCDIR, function(err1, files) {
    var filesOnly = [];

    if(!err1) {

        for(var i = 0; i < files.length; i++) {

            (function(i) {
                var imgFilePath = SYNCDIR + '/' + files[i];
                fs.stat(imgFilePath, function(stat){
                    if (stat.isFile()){
                        filesOnly[i] = stat;
                    }
                });
            })(i);

        }
    }
});


One way is to rewrite the innards of the loop to use a closure:

fs.readdir(SYNCDIR, function(err1, files) {
    var filesOnly = [];
    if(!err1) {
        for(var i = 0; i < files.length; i++) {
            (function(index) {
                var imgFilePath = SYNCDIR + '/' + files[index];
                fs.stat(imgFilePath, function(stat){
                    if (stat.isFile()){
                        filesOnly[index] = stat;
                    }
                });
            })(i);
        }
    }
});

A better looking example, achieving the same, using Array.prototype.forEach:

fs.readdir(SYNCDIR, function(err1, files) {
    var filesOnly = [];
    if(!err1) {
        files.forEach(function(file, i) {
            var imgFilePath = SYNCDIR + '/' + file;
            fs.stat(imgFilePath, function(stat){
                if (stat.isFile()){
                    filesOnly[i] = stat;
                }
            });
        });
    }
});


Alternatively use the new threads module ( https://github.com/robtweed/Q-Oper8 ) and then you can do all this stuff much more simply using standard synchronous coding within the threads child processes, since they only deal with one user's request at a time.

Goodbye to async logic and nested callbacks!

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号