开发者

iterating through 2-d array in VB.Net

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-03-31 00:04 出处:网络
I was amazed (and horrified) that the following code works in Vb.Net Dim test2DArr As String(,) = {{\"A\", \"B\"}, {\"C\", \"D\"}}

I was amazed (and horrified) that the following code works in Vb.Net

Dim test2DArr As String(,) = {{"A", "B"}, {"C", "D"}}

For Each s As String In test2DArr
  MsgBox(s)
Next

When run, four message boxes pop up showing "A", "B", "C", and then "D".

In other words, it has exactly the same behavior as:

Dim test1DArr As String() = {"A", "B", "C", "D"}

For Each s As String In test1DArr
  MsgBox(s)
Next

Can someone explain this "Feature" ? I need to impose some structure here that is apparently not supported. The first code example above should be:

Dim test2DArr As String(,) = {{"A", "B"}, {"C", "D"}}

For Each arr As String(,) In test2DArr
  MsgBox(arr(0) & ", " & arr(1))
Next

and should produc开发者_StackOverflowe two message boxes: "A, B" and "C, D", but the compiler insists that iterating through a 2-d array yields a sequence of strings, not a sequence of arrays of strings.

Am I doing something wrong or is .Net's implementation of 2-D arrays really that flimsy?


is .Net's implementation of 2-D arrays really that flimsy?

Yes. Multi-dimensional arrays were never really supported in .NET. I’m not sure why they exist at all (as opposed to arrays-of-arrays, i.e. jagged arrays: String()()). In any case, all the support is tailored to the special case of one-dimensional arrays. The framework type for arrays is always the same, regardless of dimensionality, and the interface implementation (in this case of IEnumerable(Of T)) is tailored to this common use case.

This means that the type of the array is always an “array of strings”, and thus it always implements the interface IEnumerable(Of String). This explains why your second code cannot work: in order for it to work, the type of the array would have to be different.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消